1,015,401 results for 'using System.Linq;' (27 ms)
MultipleEnumerationIssueTests.cs https://github.com/davidroth/ILSpy.git | C# | 679 lines
39using System.Collections.Generic; 40using System.Linq; 41class TestClass 321using System.Collections.Generic; 322using System.Linq; 323class TestClass 596using System.Collections.Generic; 597using System.Linq; 598class TestClass 615using System.Collections.Generic; 616using System.Linq; 617class TestClass 638using System.Collections.Generic; 639using System.Linq; 640class TestClassMultipleEnumerationIssueTests.cs https://github.com/EdwardWu99/ILSpy.git | C# | 679 lines
39using System.Collections.Generic; 40using System.Linq; 41class TestClass 321using System.Collections.Generic; 322using System.Linq; 323class TestClass 596using System.Collections.Generic; 597using System.Linq; 598class TestClass 615using System.Collections.Generic; 616using System.Linq; 617class TestClass 638using System.Collections.Generic; 639using System.Linq; 640class TestClassQueryTests.cs https://github.com/EkardNT/Roslyn.git | C# | 2,050 lines
4using System.IO; 5using System.Linq; 6using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols; 917using System; 918using System.Linq; 919 1743 string source = 1744@"using System.Linq; 1745 1965 string sourceCode = @" 1966using System.Linq; // Needed for speculative code. 1967 1989 // using System.Linq; // Needed for speculative code. 1990 Diagnostic(ErrorCode.INF_UnusedUsingDirective, "using System.Linq;")); 1991LinqTests.cs https://github.com/davidroth/ILSpy.git | C# | 396 lines
207 { 208 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 209class TestClass { 258 { 259 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 260class TestClass { 322 { 323 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 324class TestClass 341 { 342 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 343class TestClass 363 { 364 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 365class TestClassLinqTests.cs https://github.com/EdwardWu99/ILSpy.git | C# | 396 lines
207 { 208 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 209class TestClass { 258 { 259 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 260class TestClass { 322 { 323 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 324class TestClass 341 { 342 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 343class TestClass 363 { 364 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 365class TestClassCodeGenImplicitlyTypeArraysTests.cs https://github.com/EkardNT/Roslyn.git | C# | 1,042 lines
353 var source = @" 354using System.Linq; 355 710 var source = @" 711using System.Linq; 712 852 var source = @" 853using System.Linq; 854 887using System.Collections.Generic; 888using System.Linq; 889 920using System; 921using System.Linq; 922Bowling.Domain.XML https://github.com/edqwerty1/Bowling.git | XML | 1,452 lines
25 using System.Collections.Generic; 26 using System.Linq; 27 using System.Threading; 149 using System.Collections.Generic; 150 using System.Linq; 151 using System.Threading; 401 using System.Collections.Generic; 402 using System.Linq; 403 using System.Threading; 441 using System.Collections.Generic; 442 using System.Linq; 443 using System.Threading; 1082 using System.Collections.Generic; 1083 using System.Linq; 1084Bowling.XML https://github.com/edqwerty1/Bowling.git | XML | 1,462 lines
25 using System.Collections.Generic; 26 using System.Linq; 27 using System.Threading; 149 using System.Collections.Generic; 150 using System.Linq; 151 using System.Threading; 401 using System.Collections.Generic; 402 using System.Linq; 403 using System.Threading; 441 using System.Collections.Generic; 442 using System.Linq; 443 using System.Threading; 1082 using System.Collections.Generic; 1083 using System.Linq; 1084LinqTests.cs https://gitlab.com/N3X15/ILSpy.git | C# | 337 lines
31 { 32 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 33class TestClass { 188 { 189 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 190class TestClass { 222 { 223 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 224class TestClass { 239 { 240 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 241class TestClass { 256 { 257 string program = @"using System; using System.Linq; 258class TestClass {C#.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 882 lines
406 <div class="blog-content"> 407 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 408{ 542 using System.Collections.Generic; 543 using System.Linq; 544 using System.Text; 575 using System.Collections.Generic; 576 using System.Linq; 577 using System.Text; 603 using System.Collections.Generic; 604 using System.Linq; 605 using System.Text; 751 <div class="blog-content"> 752 <p>After trying <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb425822.aspx" rel="tag">linq to sql</a>, <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa697427(VS.80).aspx" rel="tag">the ado.net entity framework</a>, php's <a href="http://codeigniter.com/">code igniter</a> framework, php's <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/" rel="rel">cake framework</a>; I'm realizing how much of rails really depends on the inner workings of ruby itself to do what it is able to do.  I've looked and poked around <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/" rel="rel">Castle's Active Record</a> and it does some heavy lifting, but it still seems to deviate too much from rails's version of active record.  One of the key things of porting a concept, is to keep it as close as possible so that developers can rely more on the same convention without having to relearn the concept in a different domain specific language.  Plus, I cringe a little when it leans too much on using <a href="http://www.hibernate.org/343.html" rel="tag">NHibernate</a>. </p> <p>It goes back to the whole "Don't make me think principle", that developers often to have to keep in mind when developing for an end user.  At first, I was thinking about creating a port would be simpler using linq with either "linq to sql" or the currently released "ado.net entity framework". After investigating, it would take a ton of invested time to either write a code generator for visual studio that would changed the way the pocos (plain old c# objects) are generated in order in corporate the changes. Also not to mention that these frameworks heavily rely on a repository pattern, that would probably cause too much pain to change for just one developer.  </p> <p>Square one?  Well close enough. C# and ruby have different strengths and weaknesses. However with enough thought and using C#3.0, I think its completely possible to get something that closely resembles rails enough to give anyone who has worked with rails, something that would be familiar if they needed to work on a project in .Net.  </p> <p class="blogger-labels">Labels: <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Active Record.aspx">Active Record</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/BHAG.aspx">BHAG</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/C#.aspx">C#</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/CSharp.aspx">CSharp</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Linq To Sql.aspx">Linq To Sql</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Rails.aspx">Rails</a></p> 753 </div>CSharp.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 882 lines
406 <div class="blog-content"> 407 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 408{ 542 using System.Collections.Generic; 543 using System.Linq; 544 using System.Text; 575 using System.Collections.Generic; 576 using System.Linq; 577 using System.Text; 603 using System.Collections.Generic; 604 using System.Linq; 605 using System.Text; 751 <div class="blog-content"> 752 <p>After trying <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb425822.aspx" rel="tag">linq to sql</a>, <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa697427(VS.80).aspx" rel="tag">the ado.net entity framework</a>, php's <a href="http://codeigniter.com/">code igniter</a> framework, php's <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/" rel="rel">cake framework</a>; I'm realizing how much of rails really depends on the inner workings of ruby itself to do what it is able to do.  I've looked and poked around <a href="http://www.cakephp.org/" rel="rel">Castle's Active Record</a> and it does some heavy lifting, but it still seems to deviate too much from rails's version of active record.  One of the key things of porting a concept, is to keep it as close as possible so that developers can rely more on the same convention without having to relearn the concept in a different domain specific language.  Plus, I cringe a little when it leans too much on using <a href="http://www.hibernate.org/343.html" rel="tag">NHibernate</a>. </p> <p>It goes back to the whole "Don't make me think principle", that developers often to have to keep in mind when developing for an end user.  At first, I was thinking about creating a port would be simpler using linq with either "linq to sql" or the currently released "ado.net entity framework". After investigating, it would take a ton of invested time to either write a code generator for visual studio that would changed the way the pocos (plain old c# objects) are generated in order in corporate the changes. Also not to mention that these frameworks heavily rely on a repository pattern, that would probably cause too much pain to change for just one developer.  </p> <p>Square one?  Well close enough. C# and ruby have different strengths and weaknesses. However with enough thought and using C#3.0, I think its completely possible to get something that closely resembles rails enough to give anyone who has worked with rails, something that would be familiar if they needed to work on a project in .Net.  </p> <p class="blogger-labels">Labels: <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Active Record.aspx">Active Record</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/BHAG.aspx">BHAG</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/C#.aspx">C#</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/CSharp.aspx">CSharp</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Linq To Sql.aspx">Linq To Sql</a>, <a rel='tag' href="http://www.amptools.net/labels/Rails.aspx">Rails</a></p> 753 </div>Code.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 836 lines
349 using System.Collections.Generic; 350 using System.Linq; 351 using System.Text; 429 <div class="blog-content"> 430 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 431{ 433 using System.Collections.Generic; 434 using System.Linq; 435 using System.Text; 565 using System.Collections.Generic; 566 using System.Linq; 567 using System.Text; 626 using System.Collections.Generic; 627 using System.Linq; 628 using System.Text;IndexExtensionFromClient.cs git://github.com/ravendb/ravendb.git | C# | 2,253 lines
1204using System.Collections.Generic; 1205using System.Linq; 1206namespace ETIS 1790using System.Collections.Generic; 1791using System.Linq; 1792namespace ETIS 1829using System.Collections.Generic; 1830using System.Linq; 1831namespace ETIS 1874using System.Collections.Generic; 1875using System.Linq; 1876namespace ETIS 1949using System.Collections.Generic; 1950using System.Linq; 1951namespace ETISlinq-guide.md https://github.com/2sic/2sxc.git | Markdown | 223 lines
18```razor 19@using System.Linq; 20@{ 73```razor 74@using System.Linq; 75@{ 96```razor 97@using System.Linq; 98@using Dynlist = System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<dynamic>; 156```razor 157@using System.Linq; 158@using Dynlist = System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<dynamic>; 204```razor 205@using System.Linq; 206@using Dynlist = System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<dynamic>;Bowling.xml https://github.com/edqwerty1/Bowling.git | XML | 943 lines
31 using System.Collections.Generic; 32 using System.Linq; 33 using System.Threading; 565 using System.Collections.Generic; 566 using System.Linq; 567 using System.Threading; 690 using System.Collections.Generic; 691 using System.Linq; 692 using System.Threading; 719 using System.Collections.Generic; 720 using System.Linq; 721 using System.Threading; 748 using System.Collections.Generic; 749 using System.Linq; 750 using System.Threading;XmlDocument.xml https://github.com/edqwerty1/Bowling.git | XML | 943 lines
31 using System.Collections.Generic; 32 using System.Linq; 33 using System.Threading; 565 using System.Collections.Generic; 566 using System.Linq; 567 using System.Threading; 690 using System.Collections.Generic; 691 using System.Linq; 692 using System.Threading; 719 using System.Collections.Generic; 720 using System.Linq; 721 using System.Threading; 748 using System.Collections.Generic; 749 using System.Linq; 750 using System.Threading;XmlDocument.xml https://github.com/edqwerty1/Bowling.git | XML | 943 lines
31 using System.Collections.Generic; 32 using System.Linq; 33 using System.Threading; 565 using System.Collections.Generic; 566 using System.Linq; 567 using System.Threading; 690 using System.Collections.Generic; 691 using System.Linq; 692 using System.Threading; 719 using System.Collections.Generic; 720 using System.Linq; 721 using System.Threading; 748 using System.Collections.Generic; 749 using System.Linq; 750 using System.Threading;Flickr.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 411 lines
51 <div class="blog-content"> 52 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 53{ 55 using System.Collections.Generic; 56 using System.Linq; 57 using System.Text; 74 using System.Collections.Generic; 75 using System.Linq; 76 using System.Security.Cryptography; 220 using System.Collections.Generic; 221 using System.Linq; 222 using System.Text; 248 using System.Collections.Generic; 249 using System.Linq; 250 using System.Text;Amplify.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 883 lines
345 <div class="blog-content"> 346 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 347{ 423 using System.Collections.Generic; 424 using System.Linq; 425 using System.Text; 514 using System.Collections.Generic; 515 using System.Linq; 516 using System.Text; 542 using System.Collections.Generic; 543 using System.Linq; 544 using System.Text; 682 using System.Collections.Generic; 683 using System.Linq; 684 using System.Text;WCF.aspx https://github.com/pvencill/amptools.git | ASP.NET | 500 lines
94 <div class="blog-content"> 95 <p>Even though there are quite a few opensource .Net libraries REST API out there, and a really impressive one for Flickr, they tend to never evolve or fork to use the newer framework technologies.  I think its great that they support 1.0, 2.0, and mono, but why not fork and support WCF?  I think part of the problem that .Net 3.5 use is not wide spread as it should be is not only information overload and bad naming for extension libraries, but also lack of opensource support to provide libraries and basis for current technology.  </p> <p>Flickr tends to be a little more tricky to use when calling it than some other REST APIs. WCF is a cool technology, but needs to be massaged when using it with Flickr due to a couple of gotchas and not so obvious things about WCF. In order to use Flickr, you need to register for an api_key and a shared secret code which is used to create an MD5 hash. You also need to create that MD5 each time you call a method, using the url parameters in a certain way. </p> <p>There are also a few not so obvious factors about using the JSON part of Flickr. All of the .Net libraries I've seen so far, use XML. While C# is king of parsing  XML, JSON tends to be more compact, which means less expense over the wire, though it might mean more time parsing once on the developers end point. So there are tradeoffs to using it. </p> <p>When I created the classes needed to use WCF to call Flickr, I have the actual "DataContract" object (DTO, Data Transfer Object), A Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) for adding the parameters to create the MD5 signature, A base class for creating the WCF proxy, a custom "WebContentTypeMapper", The "ServiceContract" interface, the actual "Client class", and a mixins class for creating the MD5. </p> <p>Here are some of the gotchas that I ran into while getting WCF to work with Flickr. </p> <p></p> <ol> <li>Flickr makes you create a md5 hash to send with every call for ALL parameters in alphabetical order using your "Shared Secret" Code as part of the md5.   </li> <li>Flickr's Json response "Content-Type" header is sent not as "application/json" but as "text/plain" which equates to "Raw" in WCF lingo.  </li> <li>The response object is wrapped and not obvious when it comes to json how the DataContract object should be formed.  </li> <li>Flickr will wrap the json response in a javascript function unless you pass in the parameter "nojsoncallback=1" </li> </ol> <p>To get around number one, I created an extension method that takes a Hash (Dictionary<string, object>) and adds method that converts the parameters into a MD5 string. </p> <pre class="code csharp">namespace Amplify.Linq 96{ 117 using System.Collections.Generic; 118 using System.Linq; 119 using System.Security.Cryptography; 230 using System.Collections.Generic; 231 using System.Linq; 232 using System.Text; 263 using System.Collections.Generic; 264 using System.Linq; 265 using System.Text; 291 using System.Collections.Generic; 292 using System.Linq; 293 using System.Text;