🔍
redis/redis has 2.5× more findings overall — but memcached/memcached has 1.77× higher findings density per 1k LOC.
01Overview
absolute counts side by side
61,578
memcached code lines
9,988
memcached complexity
02Token cost to read raw
why dossiers exist
redis/redis
→ via code_analyze: ~2k tokens
memcached/memcached
→ via code_analyze: ~2k tokens
Either way, structured analysis collapses both to a couple of kilotokens. See it in action on the homepage.
03Line composition
code, blank, and comment shares
Code 73.9%
Blank 11.0%
Comments 15.1%
Code 74.3%
Blank 13.4%
Comments 12.3%
04Language breakdown
top 6 each
05Tech stack overlap
21 shared · 24 only in redis · 0 only in memcached
All of memcached/memcached's detected tech also appears in redis/redis — redis's stack is a superset.
06Most complex files
where the heavy lifting lives · click to drill in
redis
| File | Lines | Cx |
| src/redis-cli.c | 9,334 | 2,742 |
| src/module.c | 8,181 | 2,327 |
| src/server.c | 5,752 | 1,621 |
| src/rdb.c | 3,619 | 1,538 |
| src/t_stream.c | 4,098 | 1,461 |
| src/cluster_legacy.c | 4,334 | 1,444 |
07Code quality findings
absolute count vs density per 1k LOC
12.9
redis findings / 1k LOC
22.8
memcached findings / 1k LOC
Despite being smaller, memcached/memcached flags 1.77× more issues per 1k LOC than redis/redis — denser code, not tidier.
08Secrets & credentials
pattern-based scan
redis
✓ No hardcoded credentials detected.0 of 274,682 lines flagged
memcached
✓ No hardcoded credentials detected.0 of 61,578 lines flagged
Compare two other repositories
Drop in any two public git URLs (or owner/repo shorthand).
Or call the API directly: two parallel code_analyze requests, diff client-side. · Add to your MCP client