/old-site/archive/2007-April/001227.html
HTML | 79 lines | 66 code | 10 blank | 3 comment | 0 complexity | ca1f97b36c1ca3403b1572a22ddcb860 MD5 | raw file
- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
- <HTML>
- <HEAD>
- <TITLE> [cam.pm] Backups + next pubmeet, Re: Hangover over?
- </TITLE>
- <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
- <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:cam.pm%40cam.pm.org?Subject=%5Bcam.pm%5D%20Backups%20%2B%20next%20pubmeet%2C%20Re%3A%20Hangover%20over%3F&In-Reply-To=20070421132115.GK18070%40t8o.org">
- <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
- <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
- <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001226.html">
- <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001230.html">
- </HEAD>
- <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
- <H1>[cam.pm] Backups + next pubmeet, Re: Hangover over?</H1>
- <B>Robbie Bow</B>
- <A HREF="mailto:cam.pm%40cam.pm.org?Subject=%5Bcam.pm%5D%20Backups%20%2B%20next%20pubmeet%2C%20Re%3A%20Hangover%20over%3F&In-Reply-To=20070421132115.GK18070%40t8o.org"
- TITLE="[cam.pm] Backups + next pubmeet, Re: Hangover over?">robbie at robbiebow.co.uk
- </A><BR>
- <I>Sun Apr 22 09:11:37 BST 2007</I>
- <P><UL>
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001226.html">[cam.pm] Backups + next pubmeet, Re: Hangover over?
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001230.html">[cam.pm] Hangover over?
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#1227">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#1227">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#1227">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#1227">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <HR>
- <!--beginarticle-->
- <PRE> > I would prefer a non-Wednesday day. No doubt everyone has different
- > days to avoid. 8-}
- Always a devil to get this sort of thing right. Fridays are normally a
- Bad Idea; Thursdays sometimes also for some people. Maybe rotate the day
- of the week each month (Monday-Friday) so the 3rd Thursday of the month
- next month, 3rd Friday of June &c. That would please all of the people
- all of the time...
- > Do people really want closed software copying their data back to some
- > random company? It doesn't seem like the best idea.
- It's not ideal, but it's infinitely better than what 99% of normal users
- have, e.g. no backup regime at all. If I never have to explain to
- someone that they lost all their emails because of a hard disk failure /
- that they should use IMAP / have backups it'll be a good thing.
- Looks like there's a gap that needs filling: open automated offsite
- backups. I'll add that to my
- things-that-would-be-great-to-do-but-I-never-will list.
- </PRE>
- <!--endarticle-->
- <HR>
- <P><UL>
- <!--threads-->
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001226.html">[cam.pm] Backups + next pubmeet, Re: Hangover over?
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001230.html">[cam.pm] Hangover over?
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#1227">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#1227">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#1227">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#1227">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <hr>
- <a href="http://cam.pm.org/list/listinfo/cam.pm">More information about the Cam.pm
- mailing list</a><br>
- </body></html>