/lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-December/024327.html
https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org · HTML · 114 lines · 73 code · 34 blank · 7 comment · 0 complexity · a6fdb6b5a39b5e48a0a3eb4418a76dbf MD5 · raw file
- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
- <HTML>
- <HEAD>
- <TITLE> [whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol
- </TITLE>
- <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
- <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20US-ASCII%20vs.%20ASCII%20in%20Web%20Socket%20Protocol&In-Reply-To=%3C4B1905FC.1000205%40verizon.net%3E">
- <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
- <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
- <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="024317.html">
- <LINK REL="Next" HREF="024318.html">
- </HEAD>
- <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
- <H1>[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol</H1>
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <B>WeBMartians</B>
- <A HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20US-ASCII%20vs.%20ASCII%20in%20Web%20Socket%20Protocol&In-Reply-To=%3C4B1905FC.1000205%40verizon.net%3E"
- TITLE="[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol">webmartians at verizon.net
- </A><BR>
- <I>Fri Dec 4 04:52:12 PST 2009</I>
- <P><UL>
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="024317.html">[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="024318.html">[whatwg] Web Socket Protocol: Handling of erroneous UTF-8 on the server side?
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#24327">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#24327">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#24327">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#24327">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <HR>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- <!--beginarticle-->
- <PRE>Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII.
- There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters
- (less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII "specifications." The same can be
- said about the higher end.
- ===
- Ian Hickson wrote:
- ><i> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
- </I>><i>
- </I>>><i> I see both "US-ASCII" and "ASCII" are used in:
- </I>>><i> <A HREF="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-54">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-54</A>
- </I>>><i>
- </I>>><i> If they mean the same thing, one should be used consistently.
- </I>>><i>
- </I>>><i> In the document, US-ASCII seems to mean encoding while ASCII mean
- </I>>><i> charset. Is this common? (I guess US-ASCII is commonly considered as an
- </I>>><i> alias for ASCII. <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#Aliases">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#Aliases</A> )
- </I>>><i>
- </I>><i>
- </I>><i> I've changed the spec to use "ASCII" consistently.
- </I>><i>
- </I>><i> Cheers,
- </I>><i>
- </I>
- </PRE>
- <!--endarticle-->
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <HR>
- <P><UL>
- <!--threads-->
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="024317.html">[whatwg] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="024318.html">[whatwg] Web Socket Protocol: Handling of erroneous UTF-8 on the server side?
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#24327">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#24327">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#24327">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#24327">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <hr>
- <a href="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">More information about the whatwg
- mailing list</a><br>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- </body></html>