/lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-March/025425.html
https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org · HTML · 84 lines · 61 code · 16 blank · 7 comment · 0 complexity · dbaa44c016e4854ba6e615ef0d5b702d MD5 · raw file
- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
- <HTML>
- <HEAD>
- <TITLE> [whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </TITLE>
- <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
- <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3CC013563C-C046-40F4-BF9B-94E985197494%40webkit.org%3E">
- <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
- <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
- <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="025423.html">
- <LINK REL="Next" HREF="025557.html">
- </HEAD>
- <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
- <H1>[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.</H1>
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <B>Alexey Proskuryakov</B>
- <A HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3CC013563C-C046-40F4-BF9B-94E985197494%40webkit.org%3E"
- TITLE="[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.">ap at webkit.org
- </A><BR>
- <I>Fri Mar 5 15:32:51 PST 2010</I>
- <P><UL>
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="025423.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="025557.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#25425">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#25425">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#25425">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#25425">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <HR>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- <!--beginarticle-->
- <PRE>
- On 05.03.2010, at 13:17, Olli Pettay wrote:
- >><i> for something no one should care about, as you
- </I>>><i> implied above.
- </I>><i> From API perspective I do care. Web developers shouldn't need to know
- </I>><i> about the protocol, yet (s)he should be able to understand what
- </I>><i> bufferedAmount means.
- </I>
- An explanation like "it's how much data is buffered to be sent over
- network" seems adequate to me.
- - WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov
- </PRE>
- <!--endarticle-->
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <HR>
- <P><UL>
- <!--threads-->
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="025423.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="025557.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#25425">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#25425">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#25425">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#25425">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <hr>
- <a href="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">More information about the whatwg
- mailing list</a><br>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- </body></html>