025601.html


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3Cop.u90le0p064w2qv%40annevk-t60%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="025600.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="025614.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.</H1>
<!--htdig_noindex-->
    <B>Anne van Kesteren</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3Cop.u90le0p064w2qv%40annevk-t60%3E"
       TITLE="[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.">annevk at opera.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Mar 23 02:46:02 PDT 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="025600.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="025614.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#25601">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#25601">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#25601">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#25601">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--/htdig_noindex-->
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:27 +0100, Olli Pettay &lt;<A HREF="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">Olli.Pettay at helsinki.fi</A>&gt;  
wrote:
&gt;<i> And I certainly prefer the current behavior, where the API is not
</I>&gt;<i> so tightly bound to the protocol, and where the bufferedAmount is
</I>&gt;<i> handled more close to what progress events do with XMLHttpRequest.
</I>
We (Opera) would prefer this too. I.e. to not impose details of the  
protocol on the API.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<A HREF="http://annevankesteren.nl/">http://annevankesteren.nl/</A>
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
<!--htdig_noindex-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="025600.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="025614.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#25601">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#25601">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#25601">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#25601">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">More information about the whatwg
mailing list</a><br>
<!--/htdig_noindex-->
</body></html>

/lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-March/025601.html