/lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-March/067874.html
https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org · HTML · 78 lines · 66 code · 5 blank · 7 comment · 0 complexity · 5c3041e66415e68c57545fcb90887933 MD5 · raw file
- <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
- <HTML>
- <HEAD>
- <TITLE> [whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </TITLE>
- <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
- <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3Cop.u90le0p064w2qv%40annevk-t60%3E">
- <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
- <style type="text/css">
- pre {
- white-space: pre-wrap; /* css-2.1, curent FF, Opera, Safari */
- }
- </style>
- <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
- <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="067873.html">
- <LINK REL="Next" HREF="067887.html">
- </HEAD>
- <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
- <H1>[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.</H1>
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <B>Anne van Kesteren</B>
- <A HREF="mailto:whatwg%40lists.whatwg.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bwhatwg%5D%20WebSocket%20bufferedAmount%20includes%20overhead%20or%20not.&In-Reply-To=%3Cop.u90le0p064w2qv%40annevk-t60%3E"
- TITLE="[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.">annevk at opera.com
- </A><BR>
- <I>Tue Mar 23 02:46:02 PDT 2010</I>
- <P><UL>
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="067873.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="067887.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#67874">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#67874">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#67874">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#67874">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <HR>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- <!--beginarticle-->
- <PRE>On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:38:27 +0100, Olli Pettay <<A HREF="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">Olli.Pettay at helsinki.fi</A>>
- wrote:
- ><i> And I certainly prefer the current behavior, where the API is not
- </I>><i> so tightly bound to the protocol, and where the bufferedAmount is
- </I>><i> handled more close to what progress events do with XMLHttpRequest.
- </I>
- We (Opera) would prefer this too. I.e. to not impose details of the
- protocol on the API.
- --
- Anne van Kesteren
- <A HREF="http://annevankesteren.nl/">http://annevankesteren.nl/</A>
- </PRE>
- <!--endarticle-->
- <!--htdig_noindex-->
- <HR>
- <P><UL>
- <!--threads-->
- <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="067873.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not.
- </A></li>
- <LI>Next message: <A HREF="067887.html">[whatwg] WebSocket bufferedAmount includes overhead or not
- </A></li>
- <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
- <a href="date.html#67874">[ date ]</a>
- <a href="thread.html#67874">[ thread ]</a>
- <a href="subject.html#67874">[ subject ]</a>
- <a href="author.html#67874">[ author ]</a>
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <hr>
- <a href="http://lists.whatwg.org/listinfo.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org">More information about the whatwg
- mailing list</a><br>
- <!--/htdig_noindex-->
- </body></html>