/Lib/distutils/version.py
Python | 343 lines | 224 code | 8 blank | 111 comment | 14 complexity | b5a1fc56fa866a3e979ad471125bc15f MD5 | raw file
- #
- # distutils/version.py
- #
- # Implements multiple version numbering conventions for the
- # Python Module Distribution Utilities.
- #
- # $Id$
- #
- """Provides classes to represent module version numbers (one class for
- each style of version numbering). There are currently two such classes
- implemented: StrictVersion and LooseVersion.
- Every version number class implements the following interface:
- * the 'parse' method takes a string and parses it to some internal
- representation; if the string is an invalid version number,
- 'parse' raises a ValueError exception
- * the class constructor takes an optional string argument which,
- if supplied, is passed to 'parse'
- * __str__ reconstructs the string that was passed to 'parse' (or
- an equivalent string -- ie. one that will generate an equivalent
- version number instance)
- * __repr__ generates Python code to recreate the version number instance
- * _cmp compares the current instance with either another instance
- of the same class or a string (which will be parsed to an instance
- of the same class, thus must follow the same rules)
- """
- import re
- class Version:
- """Abstract base class for version numbering classes. Just provides
- constructor (__init__) and reproducer (__repr__), because those
- seem to be the same for all version numbering classes; and route
- rich comparisons to _cmp.
- """
- def __init__ (self, vstring=None):
- if vstring:
- self.parse(vstring)
- def __repr__ (self):
- return "%s ('%s')" % (self.__class__.__name__, str(self))
- def __eq__(self, other):
- c = self._cmp(other)
- if c is NotImplemented:
- return c
- return c == 0
- def __lt__(self, other):
- c = self._cmp(other)
- if c is NotImplemented:
- return c
- return c < 0
- def __le__(self, other):
- c = self._cmp(other)
- if c is NotImplemented:
- return c
- return c <= 0
- def __gt__(self, other):
- c = self._cmp(other)
- if c is NotImplemented:
- return c
- return c > 0
- def __ge__(self, other):
- c = self._cmp(other)
- if c is NotImplemented:
- return c
- return c >= 0
- # Interface for version-number classes -- must be implemented
- # by the following classes (the concrete ones -- Version should
- # be treated as an abstract class).
- # __init__ (string) - create and take same action as 'parse'
- # (string parameter is optional)
- # parse (string) - convert a string representation to whatever
- # internal representation is appropriate for
- # this style of version numbering
- # __str__ (self) - convert back to a string; should be very similar
- # (if not identical to) the string supplied to parse
- # __repr__ (self) - generate Python code to recreate
- # the instance
- # _cmp (self, other) - compare two version numbers ('other' may
- # be an unparsed version string, or another
- # instance of your version class)
- class StrictVersion (Version):
- """Version numbering for anal retentives and software idealists.
- Implements the standard interface for version number classes as
- described above. A version number consists of two or three
- dot-separated numeric components, with an optional "pre-release" tag
- on the end. The pre-release tag consists of the letter 'a' or 'b'
- followed by a number. If the numeric components of two version
- numbers are equal, then one with a pre-release tag will always
- be deemed earlier (lesser) than one without.
- The following are valid version numbers (shown in the order that
- would be obtained by sorting according to the supplied cmp function):
- 0.4 0.4.0 (these two are equivalent)
- 0.4.1
- 0.5a1
- 0.5b3
- 0.5
- 0.9.6
- 1.0
- 1.0.4a3
- 1.0.4b1
- 1.0.4
- The following are examples of invalid version numbers:
- 1
- 2.7.2.2
- 1.3.a4
- 1.3pl1
- 1.3c4
- The rationale for this version numbering system will be explained
- in the distutils documentation.
- """
- version_re = re.compile(r'^(\d+) \. (\d+) (\. (\d+))? ([ab](\d+))?$',
- re.VERBOSE | re.ASCII)
- def parse (self, vstring):
- match = self.version_re.match(vstring)
- if not match:
- raise ValueError("invalid version number '%s'" % vstring)
- (major, minor, patch, prerelease, prerelease_num) = \
- match.group(1, 2, 4, 5, 6)
- if patch:
- self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor, patch]))
- else:
- self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor])) + (0,)
- if prerelease:
- self.prerelease = (prerelease[0], int(prerelease_num))
- else:
- self.prerelease = None
- def __str__ (self):
- if self.version[2] == 0:
- vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version[0:2]))
- else:
- vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version))
- if self.prerelease:
- vstring = vstring + self.prerelease[0] + str(self.prerelease[1])
- return vstring
- def _cmp (self, other):
- if isinstance(other, str):
- other = StrictVersion(other)
- if self.version != other.version:
- # numeric versions don't match
- # prerelease stuff doesn't matter
- if self.version < other.version:
- return -1
- else:
- return 1
- # have to compare prerelease
- # case 1: neither has prerelease; they're equal
- # case 2: self has prerelease, other doesn't; other is greater
- # case 3: self doesn't have prerelease, other does: self is greater
- # case 4: both have prerelease: must compare them!
- if (not self.prerelease and not other.prerelease):
- return 0
- elif (self.prerelease and not other.prerelease):
- return -1
- elif (not self.prerelease and other.prerelease):
- return 1
- elif (self.prerelease and other.prerelease):
- if self.prerelease == other.prerelease:
- return 0
- elif self.prerelease < other.prerelease:
- return -1
- else:
- return 1
- else:
- assert False, "never get here"
- # end class StrictVersion
- # The rules according to Greg Stein:
- # 1) a version number has 1 or more numbers separated by a period or by
- # sequences of letters. If only periods, then these are compared
- # left-to-right to determine an ordering.
- # 2) sequences of letters are part of the tuple for comparison and are
- # compared lexicographically
- # 3) recognize the numeric components may have leading zeroes
- #
- # The LooseVersion class below implements these rules: a version number
- # string is split up into a tuple of integer and string components, and
- # comparison is a simple tuple comparison. This means that version
- # numbers behave in a predictable and obvious way, but a way that might
- # not necessarily be how people *want* version numbers to behave. There
- # wouldn't be a problem if people could stick to purely numeric version
- # numbers: just split on period and compare the numbers as tuples.
- # However, people insist on putting letters into their version numbers;
- # the most common purpose seems to be:
- # - indicating a "pre-release" version
- # ('alpha', 'beta', 'a', 'b', 'pre', 'p')
- # - indicating a post-release patch ('p', 'pl', 'patch')
- # but of course this can't cover all version number schemes, and there's
- # no way to know what a programmer means without asking him.
- #
- # The problem is what to do with letters (and other non-numeric
- # characters) in a version number. The current implementation does the
- # obvious and predictable thing: keep them as strings and compare
- # lexically within a tuple comparison. This has the desired effect if
- # an appended letter sequence implies something "post-release":
- # eg. "0.99" < "0.99pl14" < "1.0", and "5.001" < "5.001m" < "5.002".
- #
- # However, if letters in a version number imply a pre-release version,
- # the "obvious" thing isn't correct. Eg. you would expect that
- # "1.5.1" < "1.5.2a2" < "1.5.2", but under the tuple/lexical comparison
- # implemented here, this just isn't so.
- #
- # Two possible solutions come to mind. The first is to tie the
- # comparison algorithm to a particular set of semantic rules, as has
- # been done in the StrictVersion class above. This works great as long
- # as everyone can go along with bondage and discipline. Hopefully a
- # (large) subset of Python module programmers will agree that the
- # particular flavour of bondage and discipline provided by StrictVersion
- # provides enough benefit to be worth using, and will submit their
- # version numbering scheme to its domination. The free-thinking
- # anarchists in the lot will never give in, though, and something needs
- # to be done to accommodate them.
- #
- # Perhaps a "moderately strict" version class could be implemented that
- # lets almost anything slide (syntactically), and makes some heuristic
- # assumptions about non-digits in version number strings. This could
- # sink into special-case-hell, though; if I was as talented and
- # idiosyncratic as Larry Wall, I'd go ahead and implement a class that
- # somehow knows that "1.2.1" < "1.2.2a2" < "1.2.2" < "1.2.2pl3", and is
- # just as happy dealing with things like "2g6" and "1.13++". I don't
- # think I'm smart enough to do it right though.
- #
- # In any case, I've coded the test suite for this module (see
- # ../test/test_version.py) specifically to fail on things like comparing
- # "1.2a2" and "1.2". That's not because the *code* is doing anything
- # wrong, it's because the simple, obvious design doesn't match my
- # complicated, hairy expectations for real-world version numbers. It
- # would be a snap to fix the test suite to say, "Yep, LooseVersion does
- # the Right Thing" (ie. the code matches the conception). But I'd rather
- # have a conception that matches common notions about version numbers.
- class LooseVersion (Version):
- """Version numbering for anarchists and software realists.
- Implements the standard interface for version number classes as
- described above. A version number consists of a series of numbers,
- separated by either periods or strings of letters. When comparing
- version numbers, the numeric components will be compared
- numerically, and the alphabetic components lexically. The following
- are all valid version numbers, in no particular order:
- 1.5.1
- 1.5.2b2
- 161
- 3.10a
- 8.02
- 3.4j
- 1996.07.12
- 3.2.pl0
- 3.1.1.6
- 2g6
- 11g
- 0.960923
- 2.2beta29
- 1.13++
- 5.5.kw
- 2.0b1pl0
- In fact, there is no such thing as an invalid version number under
- this scheme; the rules for comparison are simple and predictable,
- but may not always give the results you want (for some definition
- of "want").
- """
- component_re = re.compile(r'(\d+ | [a-z]+ | \.)', re.VERBOSE)
- def __init__ (self, vstring=None):
- if vstring:
- self.parse(vstring)
- def parse (self, vstring):
- # I've given up on thinking I can reconstruct the version string
- # from the parsed tuple -- so I just store the string here for
- # use by __str__
- self.vstring = vstring
- components = [x for x in self.component_re.split(vstring)
- if x and x != '.']
- for i, obj in enumerate(components):
- try:
- components[i] = int(obj)
- except ValueError:
- pass
- self.version = components
- def __str__ (self):
- return self.vstring
- def __repr__ (self):
- return "LooseVersion ('%s')" % str(self)
- def _cmp (self, other):
- if isinstance(other, str):
- other = LooseVersion(other)
- if self.version == other.version:
- return 0
- if self.version < other.version:
- return -1
- if self.version > other.version:
- return 1
- # end class LooseVersion