/branches/joelandersson-matlab/Examples/ruby/variables/index.html
# · HTML · 94 lines · 77 code · 17 blank · 0 comment · 0 complexity · d7dce4ef4f27f1b3fbc4d35177c28fad MD5 · raw file
- <html>
- <head>
- <title>SWIG:Examples:ruby:variables</title>
- </head>
- <body bgcolor="#ffffff">
- <tt>SWIG/Examples/ruby/variables/</tt>
- <hr>
- <H2>Wrapping C Global Variables</H2>
- <p>
- When a C global variable appears in an interface file, SWIG tries to
- wrap it using a technique known as "variable linking." The idea is
- pretty simple---we try to create a Ruby variable (actually module method) that
- magically retrieves or updates the value of the underlying C variable when it is
- accessed. Click <a href="example.i">here</a> to see a SWIG interface with some variable
- declarations in it.
- <h2>Manipulating Variables from Ruby</h2>
- Before going any further, it is important to understand some important
- differences between C and Ruby variables. In C, a variable is
- simply a name that refers to a specific location in memory. For
- example, when you declare a global variable '<tt>double a</tt>' you
- know that somewhere in memory, 8 bytes have been set aside to hold a
- <tt>double</tt> and that <tt>a</tt> is bound to this location for the
- life of the program. In Ruby, variable creation is nothing more
- than a naming operation. For example, when you say '<tt>a = 3</tt>',
- 'a' becomes a name that refers to some object '3'. Later on, if you say
- '<tt>a = 7.5</tt>, the name 'a' is bound to an entirely different object
- containing the value '7.5' (the contents of the original object are not
- changed). The end result of this is that a variable in Ruby can refer
- to a virtually unlimited number of different objects (memory locations)
- over the lifetime of a program.
- <p>
- Because of Ruby's somewhat unusual variable assignment semantics, it is not
- possible to directly link a C global variable into an equivalent Ruby variable.
- Instead, all C global variables are accessed as attributes of the module.
- For example, if you had a global variable
- <blockquote>
- <pre>
- double foo;
- </pre>
- </blockquote>
- it will be accessed in the Ruby module as <tt>Example.foo</tt>. Click
- <a href="runme.rb">here</a> to see a script that updates and prints
- out the values of the variables using this technique.
- <h2>Key points</h2>
- <ul>
- <li>When a global variable has the type "<tt>char *</tt>", SWIG manages it as a character
- string. However, whenever the value of such a variable is set from Ruby, the old
- value is destroyed using <tt>free()</tt>.
- <li><tt>signed char</tt> and <tt>unsigned char</tt> are handled as small 8-bit integers.
- <li>String array variables such as '<tt>char name[256]</tt>' are managed as Ruby strings, but
- when setting the value, the result is truncated to the maximum length of the array. Furthermore, the string is assumed to be null-terminated.
- <li>When structures and classes are used as global variables, they are mapped into pointers.
- Getting the "value" returns a pointer to the global variable. Setting the value of a structure results in a memory copy from a pointer to the global.
- </ul>
- <h2>Creating read-only variables</h2>
- The <tt>%immutable</tt> and <tt>%mutable</tt> directives can be used to
- specify a collection of read-only variables. For example:
- <blockquote>
- <pre>
- %immutable;
- int status;
- double blah;
- ...
- %mutable;
- </pre>
- </blockquote>
- The <tt>%immutable</tt> directive remains in effect until it is explicitly disabled
- using the <tt>%mutable</tt> directive.
- <h2>Comments</h2>
- <ul>
- <li>Management of global variables is one of the most problematic aspects
- of C/C++ wrapping because the scripting interface and resulting memory management
- is much trickier than simply creating a wrapper function.
- </ul>
- </body>
- </html>
- <hr>