PageRenderTime 65ms CodeModel.GetById 20ms RepoModel.GetById 1ms app.codeStats 0ms

/contrib/cvs/doc/cvsclient.texi

https://bitbucket.org/freebsd/freebsd-head/
Unknown | 2080 lines | 1788 code | 292 blank | 0 comment | 0 complexity | d0204570b0f364de896fd056ee1a9ca7 MD5 | raw file
Possible License(s): MPL-2.0-no-copyleft-exception, BSD-3-Clause, LGPL-2.0, LGPL-2.1, BSD-2-Clause, 0BSD, JSON, AGPL-1.0, GPL-2.0
  1. \input texinfo @c -*- texinfo -*-
  2. @setfilename cvsclient.info
  3. @include version-client.texi
  4. @dircategory Programming
  5. @direntry
  6. * cvsclient: (cvsclient). The CVS client/server protocol.
  7. @end direntry
  8. @node Top
  9. @top CVS Client/Server
  10. This document describes the client/server protocol used by CVS. It does
  11. not describe how to use or administer client/server CVS; see the regular
  12. CVS manual for that. This is version @value{VERSION} of the protocol
  13. specification---@xref{Introduction}, for more on what this version number
  14. means.
  15. @menu
  16. * Introduction:: What is CVS and what is the client/server protocol for?
  17. * Goals:: Basic design decisions, requirements, scope, etc.
  18. * Connection and Authentication:: Various ways to connect to the server
  19. * Password scrambling:: Scrambling used by pserver
  20. * Protocol:: Complete description of the protocol
  21. * Protocol Notes:: Possible enhancements, limitations, etc. of the protocol
  22. @end menu
  23. @node Introduction
  24. @chapter Introduction
  25. CVS is a version control system (with some additional configuration
  26. management functionality). It maintains a central @dfn{repository}
  27. which stores files (often source code), including past versions,
  28. information about who modified them and when, and so on. People who
  29. wish to look at or modify those files, known as @dfn{developers}, use
  30. CVS to @dfn{check out} a @dfn{working directory} from the repository, to
  31. @dfn{check in} new versions of files to the repository, and other
  32. operations such as viewing the modification history of a file. If
  33. developers are connected to the repository by a network, particularly a
  34. slow or flaky one, the most efficient way to use the network is with the
  35. CVS-specific protocol described in this document.
  36. Developers, using the machine on which they store their working
  37. directory, run the CVS @dfn{client} program. To perform operations
  38. which cannot be done locally, it connects to the CVS @dfn{server}
  39. program, which maintains the repository. For more information on how
  40. to connect see @ref{Connection and Authentication}.
  41. This document describes the CVS protocol. Unfortunately, it does not
  42. yet completely document one aspect of the protocol---the detailed
  43. operation of each CVS command and option---and one must look at the CVS
  44. user documentation, @file{cvs.texinfo}, for that information. The
  45. protocol is non-proprietary (anyone who wants to is encouraged to
  46. implement it) and an implementation, known as CVS, is available under
  47. the GNU Public License. The CVS distribution, containing this
  48. implementation, @file{cvs.texinfo}, and a copy (possibly more or less up
  49. to date than what you are reading now) of this document,
  50. @file{cvsclient.texi}, can be found at the usual GNU FTP sites, with a
  51. filename such as @file{cvs-@var{version}.tar.gz}.
  52. This is version @value{VERSION} of the protocol specification. This
  53. version number is intended only to aid in distinguishing different
  54. versions of this specification. Although the specification is currently
  55. maintained in conjunction with the CVS implementation, and carries the
  56. same version number, it also intends to document what is involved with
  57. interoperating with other implementations (such as other versions of
  58. CVS); see @ref{Requirements}. This version number should not be used
  59. by clients or servers to determine what variant of the protocol to
  60. speak; they should instead use the @code{valid-requests} and
  61. @code{Valid-responses} mechanism (@pxref{Protocol}), which is more
  62. flexible.
  63. @node Goals
  64. @chapter Goals
  65. @itemize @bullet
  66. @item
  67. Do not assume any access to the repository other than via this protocol.
  68. It does not depend on NFS, rdist, etc.
  69. @item
  70. Providing a reliable transport is outside this protocol. The protocol
  71. expects a reliable transport that is transparent (that is, there is no
  72. translation of characters, including characters such as
  73. linefeeds or carriage returns), and can transmit all 256 octets (for
  74. example for proper handling of binary files, compression, and
  75. encryption). The encoding of characters specified by the protocol (the
  76. names of requests and so on) is the invariant ISO 646 character set (a
  77. subset of most popular character sets including ASCII and others). For
  78. more details on running the protocol over the TCP reliable transport,
  79. see @ref{Connection and Authentication}.
  80. @item
  81. Security and authentication are handled outside this protocol (but see
  82. below about @samp{cvs kserver} and @samp{cvs pserver}).
  83. @item
  84. The protocol makes it possible for updates to be atomic with respect to
  85. checkins; that is if someone commits changes to several files in one cvs
  86. command, then an update by someone else would either get all the
  87. changes, or none of them. The current @sc{cvs} server can't do this,
  88. but that isn't the protocol's fault.
  89. @item
  90. The protocol is, with a few exceptions, transaction-based. That is, the
  91. client sends all its requests (without waiting for server responses),
  92. and then waits for the server to send back all responses (without
  93. waiting for further client requests). This has the advantage of
  94. minimizing network turnarounds and the disadvantage of sometimes
  95. transferring more data than would be necessary if there were a richer
  96. interaction. Another, more subtle, advantage is that there is no need
  97. for the protocol to provide locking for features such as making checkins
  98. atomic with respect to updates. Any such locking can be handled
  99. entirely by the server. A good server implementation (such as the
  100. current @sc{cvs} server) will make sure that it does not have any such
  101. locks in place whenever it is waiting for communication with the client;
  102. this prevents one client on a slow or flaky network from interfering
  103. with the work of others.
  104. @item
  105. It is a general design goal to provide only one way to do a given
  106. operation (where possible). For example, implementations have no choice
  107. about whether to terminate lines with linefeeds or some other
  108. character(s), and request and response names are case-sensitive. This
  109. is to enhance interoperability. If a protocol allows more than one way
  110. to do something, it is all too easy for some implementations to support
  111. only some of them (perhaps accidentally).
  112. @c I vaguely remember reading, probably in an RFC, about the problems
  113. @c that were caused when some people decided that SMTP should accept
  114. @c other line termination (in the message ("DATA")?) than CRLF. However, I
  115. @c can't seem to track down the reference.
  116. @end itemize
  117. @node Connection and Authentication
  118. @chapter How to Connect to and Authenticate Oneself to the CVS server
  119. Connection and authentication occurs before the CVS protocol itself is
  120. started. There are several ways to connect.
  121. @table @asis
  122. @item server
  123. If the client has a way to execute commands on the server, and provide
  124. input to the commands and output from them, then it can connect that
  125. way. This could be the usual rsh (port 514) protocol, Kerberos rsh,
  126. SSH, or any similar mechanism. The client may allow the user to specify
  127. the name of the server program; the default is @code{cvs}. It is
  128. invoked with one argument, @code{server}. Once it invokes the server,
  129. the client proceeds to start the cvs protocol.
  130. @item kserver
  131. The kerberized server listens on a port (in the current implementation,
  132. by having inetd call "cvs kserver") which defaults to 1999. The client
  133. connects, sends the usual kerberos authentication information, and then
  134. starts the cvs protocol. Note: port 1999 is officially registered for
  135. another use, and in any event one cannot register more than one port for
  136. CVS, so GSS-API (see below) is recommended instead of kserver as a way
  137. to support kerberos.
  138. @item pserver
  139. The name @dfn{pserver} is somewhat confusing. It refers to both a
  140. generic framework which allows the CVS protocol to support several
  141. authentication mechanisms, and a name for a specific mechanism which
  142. transfers a username and a cleartext password. Servers need not support
  143. all mechanisms, and in fact servers will typically want to support only
  144. those mechanisms which meet the relevant security needs.
  145. The pserver server listens on a port (in the current
  146. implementation, by having inetd call "cvs pserver") which defaults to
  147. 2401 (this port is officially registered). The client
  148. connects, and sends the following:
  149. @itemize @bullet
  150. @item
  151. the string @samp{BEGIN AUTH REQUEST}, a linefeed,
  152. @item
  153. the cvs root, a linefeed,
  154. @item
  155. the username, a linefeed,
  156. @item
  157. the password trivially encoded (see @ref{Password scrambling}), a
  158. linefeed,
  159. @item
  160. the string @samp{END AUTH REQUEST}, and a linefeed.
  161. @end itemize
  162. The client must send the
  163. identical string for cvs root both here and later in the
  164. @code{Root} request of the cvs
  165. protocol itself. Servers are encouraged to enforce this restriction.
  166. The possible server responses (each of which is followed by a linefeed)
  167. are the following. Note that although there is a small similarity
  168. between this authentication protocol and the cvs protocol, they are
  169. separate.
  170. @table @code
  171. @item I LOVE YOU
  172. The authentication is successful. The client proceeds with the cvs
  173. protocol itself.
  174. @item I HATE YOU
  175. The authentication fails. After sending this response, the server may
  176. close the connection. It is up to the server to decide whether to give
  177. this response, which is generic, or a more specific response using
  178. @samp{E} and/or @samp{error}.
  179. @item E @var{text}
  180. Provide a message for the user. After this response, the authentication
  181. protocol continues with another response. Typically the server will
  182. provide a series of @samp{E} responses followed by @samp{error}.
  183. Compatibility note: @sc{cvs} 1.9.10 and older clients will print
  184. @code{unrecognized auth response} and @var{text}, and then exit, upon
  185. receiving this response.
  186. @item error @var{code} @var{text}
  187. The authentication fails. After sending this response, the server may
  188. close the connection. The @var{code} is a code describing why it
  189. failed, intended for computer consumption. The only code currently
  190. defined is @samp{0} which is nonspecific, but clients must silently
  191. treat any unrecognized codes as nonspecific.
  192. The @var{text} should be supplied to the
  193. user. Compatibility note: @sc{cvs} 1.9.10 and older clients will print
  194. @code{unrecognized auth response} and @var{text}, and then exit, upon
  195. receiving this response.
  196. Note that @var{text} for this response, or the @var{text} in an @code{E}
  197. response, is not designed for machine parsing. More vigorous use of
  198. @var{code}, or future extensions, will be needed to prove a cleaner
  199. machine-parseable indication of what the error was.
  200. @end table
  201. @c If you are thinking of putting samp or code around BEGIN AUTH REQUEST
  202. @c and friends, watch for overfull hboxes.
  203. If the client wishes to merely authenticate without starting the cvs
  204. protocol, the procedure is the same, except BEGIN AUTH REQUEST is
  205. replaced with BEGIN VERIFICATION REQUEST, END AUTH REQUEST
  206. is replaced with END VERIFICATION REQUEST, and upon receipt of
  207. I LOVE YOU the connection is closed rather than continuing.
  208. Another mechanism is GSSAPI authentication. GSSAPI is a
  209. generic interface to security services such as kerberos. GSSAPI is
  210. specified in RFC2078 (GSSAPI version 2) and RFC1508 (GSSAPI version 1);
  211. we are not aware of differences between the two which affect the
  212. protocol in incompatible ways, so we make no attempt to specify one
  213. version or the other.
  214. The procedure here is to start with @samp{BEGIN
  215. GSSAPI REQUEST}. GSSAPI authentication information is then exchanged
  216. between the client and the server. Each packet of information consists
  217. of a two byte big-endian length, followed by that many bytes of data.
  218. After the GSSAPI authentication is complete, the server continues with
  219. the responses described above (@samp{I LOVE YOU}, etc.).
  220. @item future possibilities
  221. There are a nearly unlimited number of ways to connect and authenticate.
  222. One might want to allow access based on IP address (similar to the usual
  223. rsh protocol but with different/no restrictions on ports < 1024), to
  224. adopt mechanisms such as Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM), to
  225. allow users to run their own servers under their own usernames without
  226. root access, or any number of other possibilities. The way to add
  227. future mechanisms, for the most part, should be to continue to use port
  228. 2401, but to use different strings in place of @samp{BEGIN AUTH
  229. REQUEST}.
  230. @end table
  231. @node Password scrambling
  232. @chapter Password scrambling algorithm
  233. The pserver authentication protocol, as described in @ref{Connection and
  234. Authentication}, trivially encodes the passwords. This is only to
  235. prevent inadvertent compromise; it provides no protection against even a
  236. relatively unsophisticated attacker. For comparison, HTTP Basic
  237. Authentication (as described in RFC2068) uses BASE64 for a similar
  238. purpose. CVS uses its own algorithm, described here.
  239. The scrambled password starts with @samp{A}, which serves to identify
  240. the scrambling algorithm in use. After that follows a single octet for
  241. each character in the password, according to a fixed encoding. The
  242. values are shown here, with the encoded values in decimal. Control
  243. characters, space, and characters outside the invariant ISO 646
  244. character set are not shown; such characters are not recommended for use
  245. in passwords. There is a long discussion of character set issues in
  246. @ref{Protocol Notes}.
  247. @example
  248. 0 111 P 125 p 58
  249. ! 120 1 52 A 57 Q 55 a 121 q 113
  250. " 53 2 75 B 83 R 54 b 117 r 32
  251. 3 119 C 43 S 66 c 104 s 90
  252. 4 49 D 46 T 124 d 101 t 44
  253. % 109 5 34 E 102 U 126 e 100 u 98
  254. & 72 6 82 F 40 V 59 f 69 v 60
  255. ' 108 7 81 G 89 W 47 g 73 w 51
  256. ( 70 8 95 H 38 X 92 h 99 x 33
  257. ) 64 9 65 I 103 Y 71 i 63 y 97
  258. * 76 : 112 J 45 Z 115 j 94 z 62
  259. + 67 ; 86 K 50 k 93
  260. , 116 < 118 L 42 l 39
  261. - 74 = 110 M 123 m 37
  262. . 68 > 122 N 91 n 61
  263. / 87 ? 105 O 35 _ 56 o 48
  264. @end example
  265. @node Protocol
  266. @chapter The CVS client/server protocol
  267. In the following, @samp{\n} refers to a linefeed and @samp{\t} refers to
  268. a horizontal tab; @dfn{requests} are what the client sends and
  269. @dfn{responses} are what the server sends. In general, the connection is
  270. governed by the client---the server does not send responses without
  271. first receiving requests to do so; see @ref{Response intro} for more
  272. details of this convention.
  273. It is typical, early in the connection, for the client to transmit a
  274. @code{Valid-responses} request, containing all the responses it
  275. supports, followed by a @code{valid-requests} request, which elicits
  276. from the server a @code{Valid-requests} response containing all the
  277. requests it understands. In this way, the client and server each find
  278. out what the other supports before exchanging large amounts of data
  279. (such as file contents).
  280. @c Hmm, having 3 sections in this menu makes a certain amount of sense
  281. @c but that structure gets lost in the printed manual (not sure about
  282. @c HTML). Perhaps there is a better way.
  283. @menu
  284. General protocol conventions:
  285. * Entries Lines:: Transmitting RCS data
  286. * File Modes:: Read, write, execute, and possibly more...
  287. * Filenames:: Conventions regarding filenames
  288. * File transmissions:: How file contents are transmitted
  289. * Strings:: Strings in various requests and responses
  290. * Dates:: Times and dates
  291. The protocol itself:
  292. * Request intro:: General conventions relating to requests
  293. * Requests:: List of requests
  294. * Response intro:: General conventions relating to responses
  295. * Response pathnames:: The "pathname" in responses
  296. * Responses:: List of responses
  297. * Text tags:: More details about the MT response
  298. An example session, and some further observations:
  299. * Example:: A conversation between client and server
  300. * Requirements:: Things not to omit from an implementation
  301. * Obsolete:: Former protocol features
  302. @end menu
  303. @node Entries Lines
  304. @section Entries Lines
  305. Entries lines are transmitted as:
  306. @example
  307. / @var{name} / @var{version} / @var{conflict} / @var{options} / @var{tag_or_date}
  308. @end example
  309. @var{tag_or_date} is either @samp{T} @var{tag} or @samp{D} @var{date}
  310. or empty. If it is followed by a slash, anything after the slash
  311. shall be silently ignored.
  312. @var{version} can be empty, or start with @samp{0} or @samp{-}, for no
  313. user file, new user file, or user file to be removed, respectively.
  314. @c FIXME: should distinguish sender and receiver behavior here; the
  315. @c "anything else" and "does not start with" are intended for future
  316. @c expansion, and we should specify a sender behavior.
  317. @var{conflict}, if it starts with @samp{+}, indicates that the file had
  318. conflicts in it. The rest of @var{conflict} is @samp{=} if the
  319. timestamp matches the file, or anything else if it doesn't. If
  320. @var{conflict} does not start with a @samp{+}, it is silently ignored.
  321. @var{options} signifies the keyword expansion options (for example
  322. @samp{-ko}). In an @code{Entry} request, this indicates the options
  323. that were specified with the file from the previous file updating
  324. response (@pxref{Response intro}, for a list of file updating
  325. responses); if the client is specifying the @samp{-k} or @samp{-A}
  326. option to @code{update}, then it is the server which figures out what
  327. overrides what.
  328. @node File Modes
  329. @section File Modes
  330. A mode is any number of repetitions of
  331. @example
  332. @var{mode-type} = @var{data}
  333. @end example
  334. separated by @samp{,}.
  335. @var{mode-type} is an identifier composed of alphanumeric characters.
  336. Currently specified: @samp{u} for user, @samp{g} for group, @samp{o}
  337. for other (see below for discussion of whether these have their POSIX
  338. meaning or are more loose). Unrecognized values of @var{mode-type}
  339. are silently ignored.
  340. @var{data} consists of any data not containing @samp{,}, @samp{\0} or
  341. @samp{\n}. For @samp{u}, @samp{g}, and @samp{o} mode types, data
  342. consists of alphanumeric characters, where @samp{r} means read, @samp{w}
  343. means write, @samp{x} means execute, and unrecognized letters are
  344. silently ignored.
  345. The two most obvious ways in which the mode matters are: (1) is it
  346. writeable? This is used by the developer communication features, and
  347. is implemented even on OS/2 (and could be implemented on DOS), whose
  348. notion of mode is limited to a readonly bit. (2) is it executable?
  349. Unix CVS users need CVS to store this setting (for shell scripts and
  350. the like). The current CVS implementation on unix does a little bit
  351. more than just maintain these two settings, but it doesn't really have
  352. a nice general facility to store or version control the mode, even on
  353. unix, much less across operating systems with diverse protection
  354. features. So all the ins and outs of what the mode means across
  355. operating systems haven't really been worked out (e.g. should the VMS
  356. port use ACLs to get POSIX semantics for groups?).
  357. @node Filenames
  358. @section Conventions regarding transmission of file names
  359. In most contexts, @samp{/} is used to separate directory and file
  360. names in filenames, and any use of other conventions (for example,
  361. that the user might type on the command line) is converted to that
  362. form. The only exceptions might be a few cases in which the server
  363. provides a magic cookie which the client then repeats verbatim, but as
  364. the server has not yet been ported beyond unix, the two rules provide
  365. the same answer (and what to do if future server ports are operating
  366. on a repository like e:/foo or CVS_ROOT:[FOO.BAR] has not been
  367. carefully thought out).
  368. Characters outside the invariant ISO 646 character set should be avoided
  369. in filenames. This restriction may need to be relaxed to allow for
  370. characters such as @samp{[} and @samp{]} (see above about non-unix
  371. servers); this has not been carefully considered (and currently
  372. implementations probably use whatever character sets that the operating
  373. systems they are running on allow, and/or that users specify). Of
  374. course the most portable practice is to restrict oneself further, to the
  375. POSIX portable filename character set as specified in POSIX.1.
  376. @node File transmissions
  377. @section File transmissions
  378. File contents (noted below as @var{file transmission}) can be sent in
  379. one of two forms. The simpler form is a number of bytes, followed by a
  380. linefeed, followed by the specified number of bytes of file contents.
  381. These are the entire contents of the specified file. Second, if both
  382. client and server support @samp{gzip-file-contents}, a @samp{z} may
  383. precede the length, and the `file contents' sent are actually compressed
  384. with @samp{gzip} (RFC1952/1951) compression. The length specified is
  385. that of the compressed version of the file.
  386. In neither case are the file content followed by any additional data.
  387. The transmission of a file will end with a linefeed iff that file (or its
  388. compressed form) ends with a linefeed.
  389. The encoding of file contents depends on the value for the @samp{-k}
  390. option. If the file is binary (as specified by the @samp{-kb} option in
  391. the appropriate place), then it is just a certain number of octets, and
  392. the protocol contributes nothing towards determining the encoding (using
  393. the file name is one widespread, if not universally popular, mechanism).
  394. If the file is text (not binary), then the file is sent as a series of
  395. lines, separated by linefeeds. If the keyword expansion is set to
  396. something other than @samp{-ko}, then it is expected that the file
  397. conform to the RCS expectations regarding keyword expansion---in
  398. particular, that it is in a character set such as ASCII in which 0x24 is
  399. a dollar sign (@samp{$}).
  400. @node Strings
  401. @section Strings
  402. In various contexts, for example the @code{Argument} request and the
  403. @code{M} response, one transmits what is essentially an arbitrary
  404. string. Often this will have been supplied by the user (for example,
  405. the @samp{-m} option to the @code{ci} request). The protocol has no
  406. mechanism to specify the character set of such strings; it would be
  407. fairly safe to stick to the invariant ISO 646 character set but the
  408. existing practice is probably to just transmit whatever the user
  409. specifies, and hope that everyone involved agrees which character set is
  410. in use, or sticks to a common subset.
  411. @node Dates
  412. @section Dates
  413. The protocol contains times and dates in various places.
  414. For the @samp{-D} option to the @code{annotate}, @code{co}, @code{diff},
  415. @code{export}, @code{history}, @code{rannotate}, @code{rdiff},
  416. @code{rtag}, @code{tag},
  417. and @code{update} requests, the server should support two formats:
  418. @example
  419. 26 May 1997 13:01:40 -0000 ; @r{RFC 822 as modified by RFC 1123}
  420. 5/26/1997 13:01:40 GMT ; @r{traditional}
  421. @end example
  422. The former format is preferred; the latter however is sent by the CVS
  423. command line client (versions 1.5 through at least 1.9).
  424. For the @samp{-d} option to the @code{log} and @code{rlog} requests,
  425. servers should at
  426. least support RFC 822/1123 format. Clients are encouraged to use this
  427. format too (the command line CVS client, version 1.10 and older, just passed
  428. along the date format specified by the user, however).
  429. The @code{Mod-time} response and @code{Checkin-time} request use RFC
  430. 822/1123 format (see the descriptions of that response and request for
  431. details).
  432. For @code{Notify}, see the description of that request.
  433. @node Request intro
  434. @section Request intro
  435. By convention, requests which begin with a capital letter do not elicit
  436. a response from the server, while all others do -- save one. The
  437. exception is @samp{gzip-file-contents}. Unrecognized requests will
  438. always elicit a response from the server, even if that request begins
  439. with a capital letter.
  440. The term @dfn{command} means a request which expects a response (except
  441. @code{valid-requests}). The general model is that the client transmits
  442. a great number of requests, but nothing happens until the very end when
  443. the client transmits a command. Although the intention is that
  444. transmitting several commands in one connection should be legal,
  445. existing servers probably have some bugs with some combinations of more
  446. than one command, and so clients may find it necessary to make several
  447. connections in some cases. This should be thought of as a workaround
  448. rather than a desired attribute of the protocol.
  449. @node Requests
  450. @section Requests
  451. Here are the requests:
  452. @table @code
  453. @item Root @var{pathname} \n
  454. Response expected: no. Tell the server which @code{CVSROOT} to use.
  455. Note that @var{pathname} is @emph{not} a fully qualified @code{CVSROOT}
  456. variable, but only the local directory part of it. @var{pathname} must
  457. already exist on the server. Again, @var{pathname} @emph{does not} include
  458. the hostname of the server, how to access the server, etc.; by the time
  459. the CVS protocol is in use, connection, authentication, etc., are
  460. already taken care of.
  461. The @code{Root} request must be sent only once, and it must be sent
  462. before any requests other than @code{Valid-responses},
  463. @code{valid-requests}, @code{UseUnchanged}, @code{Set},
  464. @code{Global_option}, @code{noop}, or @code{version}.
  465. @item Valid-responses @var{request-list} \n
  466. Response expected: no.
  467. Tell the server what responses the client will accept.
  468. request-list is a space separated list of tokens.
  469. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  470. @item valid-requests \n
  471. Response expected: yes.
  472. Ask the server to send back a @code{Valid-requests} response.
  473. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  474. @item Directory @var{local-directory} \n
  475. Additional data: @var{repository} \n. Response expected: no.
  476. Tell the server what directory to use. The @var{repository} should be a
  477. directory name from a previous server response. Note that
  478. this both gives a default for @code{Entry} and @code{Modified} and
  479. also for @code{ci} and the other commands; normal usage is to send
  480. @code{Directory} for each directory in which there will be an
  481. @code{Entry} or @code{Modified}, and then a final @code{Directory}
  482. for the original directory, then the command.
  483. The @var{local-directory} is relative to
  484. the top level at which the command is occurring (i.e., the last
  485. @code{Directory} which is sent before the command);
  486. to indicate that top level, @samp{.} should be sent for
  487. @var{local-directory}.
  488. Here is an example of where a client gets @var{repository} and
  489. @var{local-directory}. Suppose that there is a module defined by
  490. @example
  491. moddir 1dir
  492. @end example
  493. That is, one can check out @code{moddir} and it will take @code{1dir} in
  494. the repository and check it out to @code{moddir} in the working
  495. directory. Then an initial check out could proceed like this:
  496. @example
  497. C: Root /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot
  498. . . .
  499. C: Argument moddir
  500. C: Directory .
  501. C: /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot
  502. C: co
  503. S: Clear-sticky moddir/
  504. S: /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot/1dir/
  505. . . .
  506. S: ok
  507. @end example
  508. In this example the response shown is @code{Clear-sticky}, but it could
  509. be another response instead. Note that it returns two pathnames.
  510. The first one, @file{moddir/}, indicates the working
  511. directory to check out into. The second one, ending in @file{1dir/},
  512. indicates the directory to pass back to the server in a subsequent
  513. @code{Directory} request. For example, a subsequent @code{update}
  514. request might look like:
  515. @example
  516. C: Directory moddir
  517. C: /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot/1dir
  518. . . .
  519. C: update
  520. @end example
  521. For a given @var{local-directory}, the repository will be the same for
  522. each of the responses, so one can use the repository from whichever
  523. response is most convenient. Typically a client will store the
  524. repository along with the sources for each @var{local-directory}, use
  525. that same setting whenever operating on that @var{local-directory}, and
  526. not update the setting as long as the @var{local-directory} exists.
  527. A client is free to rename a @var{local-directory} at any time (for
  528. example, in response to an explicit user request). While it is true
  529. that the server supplies a @var{local-directory} to the client, as noted
  530. above, this is only the default place to put the directory. Of course,
  531. the various @code{Directory} requests for a single command (for example,
  532. @code{update} or @code{ci} request) should name a particular directory
  533. with the same @var{local-directory}.
  534. Each @code{Directory} request specifies a brand-new
  535. @var{local-directory} and @var{repository}; that is,
  536. @var{local-directory} and @var{repository} are never relative to paths
  537. specified in any previous @code{Directory} request.
  538. Here's a more complex example, in which we request an update of a
  539. working directory which has been checked out from multiple places in the
  540. repository.
  541. @example
  542. C: Argument dir1
  543. C: Directory dir1
  544. C: /home/foo/repos/mod1
  545. . . .
  546. C: Argument dir2
  547. C: Directory dir2
  548. C: /home/foo/repos/mod2
  549. . . .
  550. C: Argument dir3
  551. C: Directory dir3/subdir3
  552. C: /home/foo/repos/mod3
  553. . . .
  554. C: update
  555. @end example
  556. While directories @code{dir1} and @code{dir2} will be handled in similar
  557. fashion to the other examples given above, @code{dir3} is slightly
  558. different from the server's standpoint. Notice that module @code{mod3}
  559. is actually checked out into @code{dir3/subdir3}, meaning that directory
  560. @code{dir3} is either empty or does not contain data checked out from
  561. this repository.
  562. The above example will work correctly in @sc{cvs} 1.10.1 and later. The
  563. server will descend the tree starting from all directories mentioned in
  564. @code{Argument} requests and update those directories specifically
  565. mentioned in @code{Directory} requests.
  566. Previous versions of @sc{cvs} (1.10 and earlier) do not behave the same
  567. way. While the descent of the tree begins at all directories mentioned
  568. in @code{Argument} requests, descent into subdirectories only occurs if
  569. a directory has been mentioned in a @code{Directory} request.
  570. Therefore, the above example would succeed in updating @code{dir1} and
  571. @code{dir2}, but would skip @code{dir3} because that directory was not
  572. specifically mentioned in a @code{Directory} request. A functional
  573. version of the above that would run on a 1.10 or earlier server is as
  574. follows:
  575. @example
  576. C: Argument dir1
  577. C: Directory dir1
  578. C: /home/foo/repos/mod1
  579. . . .
  580. C: Argument dir2
  581. C: Directory dir2
  582. C: /home/foo/repos/mod2
  583. . . .
  584. C: Argument dir3
  585. C: Directory dir3
  586. C: /home/foo/repos/.
  587. . . .
  588. C: Directory dir3/subdir3
  589. C: /home/foo/repos/mod3
  590. . . .
  591. C: update
  592. @end example
  593. Note the extra @code{Directory dir3} request. It might be better to use
  594. @code{Emptydir} as the repository for the @code{dir3} directory, but the
  595. above will certainly work.
  596. One more peculiarity of the 1.10 and earlier protocol is the ordering of
  597. @code{Directory} arguments. In order for a subdirectory to be
  598. registered correctly for descent by the recursion processor, its parent
  599. must be sent first. For example, the following would not work to update
  600. @code{dir3/subdir3}:
  601. @example
  602. . . .
  603. C: Argument dir3
  604. C: Directory dir3/subdir3
  605. C: /home/foo/repos/mod3
  606. . . .
  607. C: Directory dir3
  608. C: /home/foo/repos/.
  609. . . .
  610. C: update
  611. @end example
  612. The implementation of the server in 1.10 and earlier writes the
  613. administration files for a given directory at the time of the
  614. @code{Directory} request. It also tries to register the directory with
  615. its parent to mark it for recursion. In the above example, at the time
  616. @code{dir3/subdir3} is created, the physical directory for @code{dir3}
  617. will be created on disk, but the administration files will not have been
  618. created. Therefore, when the server tries to register
  619. @code{dir3/subdir3} for recursion, the operation will silently fail
  620. because the administration files do not yet exist for @code{dir3}.
  621. @item Max-dotdot @var{level} \n
  622. Response expected: no.
  623. Tell the server that @var{level} levels of directories above the
  624. directory which @code{Directory} requests are relative to will be
  625. needed. For example, if the client is planning to use a
  626. @code{Directory} request for @file{../../foo}, it must send a
  627. @code{Max-dotdot} request with a @var{level} of at least 2.
  628. @code{Max-dotdot} must be sent before the first @code{Directory}
  629. request.
  630. @item Static-directory \n
  631. Response expected: no. Tell the server that the directory most recently
  632. specified with @code{Directory} should not have
  633. additional files checked out unless explicitly requested. The client
  634. sends this if the @code{Entries.Static} flag is set, which is controlled
  635. by the @code{Set-static-directory} and @code{Clear-static-directory}
  636. responses.
  637. @item Sticky @var{tagspec} \n
  638. Response expected: no. Tell the server that the directory most recently
  639. specified with @code{Directory} has a sticky tag or date @var{tagspec}.
  640. The first character of @var{tagspec} is @samp{T} for a tag, @samp{D}
  641. for a date, or some other character supplied by a Set-sticky response
  642. from a previous request to the server. The remainder of @var{tagspec}
  643. contains the actual tag or date, again as supplied by Set-sticky.
  644. The server should remember @code{Static-directory} and @code{Sticky}
  645. requests for a particular directory; the client need not resend them
  646. each time it sends a @code{Directory} request for a given directory.
  647. However, the server is not obliged to remember them beyond the context
  648. of a single command.
  649. @item Entry @var{entry-line} \n
  650. Response expected: no. Tell the server what version of a file is on the
  651. local machine. The name in @var{entry-line} is a name relative to the
  652. directory most recently specified with @code{Directory}. If the user
  653. is operating on only some files in a directory, @code{Entry} requests
  654. for only those files need be included. If an @code{Entry} request is
  655. sent without @code{Modified}, @code{Is-modified}, or @code{Unchanged},
  656. it means the file is
  657. lost (does not exist in the working directory). If both @code{Entry}
  658. and one of @code{Modified}, @code{Is-modified}, or @code{Unchanged} are
  659. sent for the same file, @code{Entry} must be sent first. For a
  660. given file, one can send @code{Modified}, @code{Is-modified}, or
  661. @code{Unchanged}, but not more than one of these three.
  662. @item Kopt @var{option} \n
  663. This indicates to the server which keyword expansion options to use for
  664. the file specified by the next @code{Modified} or @code{Is-modified}
  665. request (for example @samp{-kb} for a binary file). This is similar to
  666. @code{Entry}, but is used for a file for which there is no entries line.
  667. Typically this will be a file being added via an @code{add} or
  668. @code{import} request. The client may not send both @code{Kopt} and
  669. @code{Entry} for the same file.
  670. @item Checkin-time @var{time} \n
  671. For the file specified by the next @code{Modified} request, use
  672. @var{time} as the time of the checkin. The @var{time} is in the format
  673. specified by RFC822 as modified by RFC1123. The client may specify any
  674. timezone it chooses; servers will want to convert that to their own
  675. timezone as appropriate. An example of this format is:
  676. @example
  677. 26 May 1997 13:01:40 -0400
  678. @end example
  679. There is no requirement that the client and server clocks be
  680. synchronized. The client just sends its recommendation for a timestamp
  681. (based on file timestamps or whatever), and the server should just believe
  682. it (this means that the time might be in the future, for example).
  683. Note that this is not a general-purpose way to tell the server about the
  684. timestamp of a file; that would be a separate request (if there are
  685. servers which can maintain timestamp and time of checkin separately).
  686. This request should affect the @code{import} request, and may optionally
  687. affect the @code{ci} request or other relevant requests if any.
  688. @item Modified @var{filename} \n
  689. Response expected: no. Additional data: mode, \n, file transmission.
  690. Send the server a copy of one locally modified file. @var{filename} is
  691. a file within the most recent directory sent with @code{Directory}; it
  692. must not contain @samp{/}. If
  693. the user is operating on only some files in a directory, only those
  694. files need to be included. This can also be sent without @code{Entry},
  695. if there is no entry for the file.
  696. @item Is-modified @var{filename} \n
  697. Response expected: no. Additional data: none. Like @code{Modified},
  698. but used if the server only needs
  699. to know whether the file is modified, not the contents.
  700. The commands which can take @code{Is-modified} instead of
  701. @code{Modified} with no known change in behavior are: @code{admin},
  702. @code{diff} (if and only if two @samp{-r} or @samp{-D} options are
  703. specified), @code{watch-on}, @code{watch-off}, @code{watch-add},
  704. @code{watch-remove}, @code{watchers}, @code{editors},
  705. @code{log}, and @code{annotate}.
  706. For the @code{status} command, one can send @code{Is-modified} but if
  707. the client is using imperfect mechanisms such as timestamps to determine
  708. whether to consider a file modified, then the behavior will be
  709. different. That is, if one sends @code{Modified}, then the server will
  710. actually compare the contents of the file sent and the one it derives
  711. from to determine whether the file is genuinely modified. But if one
  712. sends @code{Is-modified}, then the server takes the client's word for
  713. it. A similar situation exists for @code{tag}, if the @samp{-c} option
  714. is specified.
  715. Commands for which @code{Modified} is necessary are @code{co},
  716. @code{ci}, @code{update}, and @code{import}.
  717. Commands which do not need to inform the server about a working
  718. directory, and thus should not be sending either @code{Modified} or
  719. @code{Is-modified}: @code{rdiff}, @code{rtag}, @code{history},
  720. and @code{release}.
  721. Commands for which further investigation is warranted are:
  722. @code{remove}, @code{add}, and @code{export}. Pending such
  723. investigation, the more conservative course of action is to stick to
  724. @code{Modified}.
  725. @item Unchanged @var{filename} \n
  726. Response expected: no. Tell the server that @var{filename} has not been
  727. modified in the checked out directory. The @var{filename} is
  728. a file within the most recent directory sent with @code{Directory}; it
  729. must not contain @samp{/}.
  730. @item UseUnchanged \n
  731. Response expected: no. To specify the version of the protocol described
  732. in this document, servers must support this request (although it need
  733. not do anything) and clients must issue it.
  734. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  735. @item Empty-conflicts \n
  736. Response expected: yes. This request is an alias for @code{noop}. Its
  737. presence in the list of @code{valid-requests} is intended to be used as a
  738. placeholder to alert the client that the server does not require the contents
  739. of files with conflicts that have not been modified since the merge, for
  740. operations other than diff. It was a bug in pre 1.11.22 & pre 1.12.14 servers
  741. that the contents of files with conflicts was required for the server to
  742. acknowledge the existence of the conflicts.
  743. @item Notify @var{filename} \n
  744. Response expected: no.
  745. Tell the server that an @code{edit} or @code{unedit} command has taken
  746. place. The server needs to send a @code{Notified} response, but such
  747. response is deferred until the next time that the server is sending
  748. responses.
  749. The @var{filename} is a file within the most recent directory sent with
  750. @code{Directory}; it must not contain @samp{/}.
  751. Additional data:
  752. @example
  753. @var{notification-type} \t @var{time} \t @var{clienthost} \t
  754. @var{working-dir} \t @var{watches} \n
  755. @end example
  756. where @var{notification-type} is @samp{E} for edit, @samp{U} for
  757. unedit, undefined behavior if @samp{C}, and all other letters should be
  758. silently ignored for future expansion.
  759. @var{time} is the time at which the edit or unedit took place, in a
  760. user-readable format of the client's choice (the server should treat the
  761. time as an opaque string rather than interpreting it).
  762. @c Might be useful to specify a format, but I don't know if we want to
  763. @c specify the status quo (ISO C asctime() format plus timezone) without
  764. @c offering the option of ISO8601 and/or RFC822/1123 (see cvs.texinfo
  765. @c for much much more on date formats).
  766. @var{clienthost} is the name of the host on which the edit or unedit
  767. took place, and @var{working-dir} is the pathname of the working
  768. directory where the edit or unedit took place. @var{watches} are the
  769. temporary watches, zero or more of the following characters in the
  770. following order: @samp{E} for edit, @samp{U} for unedit, @samp{C} for
  771. commit, and all other letters should be silently ignored for future
  772. expansion. If @var{notification-type} is @samp{E} the temporary watches
  773. are set; if it is @samp{U} they are cleared.
  774. If @var{watches} is followed by \t then the
  775. \t and the rest of the line should be ignored, for future expansion.
  776. The @var{time}, @var{clienthost}, and @var{working-dir} fields may not
  777. contain the characters @samp{+}, @samp{,}, @samp{>}, @samp{;}, or @samp{=}.
  778. Note that a client may be capable of performing an @code{edit} or
  779. @code{unedit} operation without connecting to the server at that time,
  780. and instead connecting to the server when it is convenient (for example,
  781. when a laptop is on the net again) to send the @code{Notify} requests.
  782. Even if a client is capable of deferring notifications, it should
  783. attempt to send them immediately (one can send @code{Notify} requests
  784. together with a @code{noop} request, for example), unless perhaps if
  785. it can know that a connection would be impossible.
  786. @item Questionable @var{filename} \n
  787. Response expected: no. Additional data: no. Tell the server to check
  788. whether @var{filename} should be ignored, and if not, next time the
  789. server sends responses, send (in a @code{M} response) @samp{?} followed
  790. by the directory and filename. @var{filename} must not contain
  791. @samp{/}; it needs to be a file in the directory named by the most
  792. recent @code{Directory} request.
  793. @c FIXME: the bit about not containing / is true of most of the
  794. @c requests, but isn't documented and should be.
  795. @item Case \n
  796. Response expected: no. Tell the server that filenames should be matched
  797. in a case-insensitive fashion. Note that this is not the primary
  798. mechanism for achieving case-insensitivity; for the most part the client
  799. keeps track of the case which the server wants to use and takes care to
  800. always use that case regardless of what the user specifies. For example
  801. the filenames given in @code{Entry} and @code{Modified} requests for the
  802. same file must match in case regardless of whether the @code{Case}
  803. request is sent. The latter mechanism is more general (it could also be
  804. used for 8.3 filenames, VMS filenames with more than one @samp{.}, and
  805. any other situation in which there is a predictable mapping between
  806. filenames in the working directory and filenames in the protocol), but
  807. there are some situations it cannot handle (ignore patterns, or
  808. situations where the user specifies a filename and the client does not
  809. know about that file).
  810. Though this request will be supported into the foreseeable future, it has been
  811. the source of numerous bug reports in the past due to the complexity of testing
  812. this functionality via the test suite and client developers are encouraged not
  813. to use it. Instead, please consider munging conflicting names and maintaining
  814. a map for communicating with the server. For example, suppose the server sends
  815. files @file{case}, @file{CASE}, and @file{CaSe}. The client could write all
  816. three files to names such as, @file{case}, @file{case_prefix_case}, and
  817. @file{case_prefix_2_case} and maintain a mapping between the file names in, for
  818. instance a new @file{CVS/Map} file.
  819. @item Argument @var{text} \n
  820. Response expected: no.
  821. Save argument for use in a subsequent command. Arguments
  822. accumulate until an argument-using command is given, at which point
  823. they are forgotten.
  824. @item Argumentx @var{text} \n
  825. Response expected: no. Append \n followed by text to the current
  826. argument being saved.
  827. @item Global_option @var{option} \n
  828. Response expected: no.
  829. Transmit one of the global options @samp{-q}, @samp{-Q}, @samp{-l},
  830. @samp{-t}, @samp{-r}, or @samp{-n}. @var{option} must be one of those
  831. strings, no variations (such as combining of options) are allowed. For
  832. graceful handling of @code{valid-requests}, it is probably better to
  833. make new global options separate requests, rather than trying to add
  834. them to this request.
  835. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  836. @item Gzip-stream @var{level} \n
  837. Response expected: no.
  838. Use zlib (RFC 1950/1951) compression to compress all further communication
  839. between the client and the server. After this request is sent, all
  840. further communication must be compressed. All further data received
  841. from the server will also be compressed. The @var{level} argument
  842. suggests to the server the level of compression that it should apply; it
  843. should be an integer between 1 and 9, inclusive, where a higher number
  844. indicates more compression.
  845. @item Kerberos-encrypt \n
  846. Response expected: no.
  847. Use Kerberos encryption to encrypt all further communication between the
  848. client and the server. This will only work if the connection was made
  849. over Kerberos in the first place. If both the @code{Gzip-stream} and
  850. the @code{Kerberos-encrypt} requests are used, the
  851. @code{Kerberos-encrypt} request should be used first. This will make
  852. the client and server encrypt the compressed data, as opposed to
  853. compressing the encrypted data. Encrypted data is generally
  854. incompressible.
  855. Note that this request does not fully prevent an attacker from hijacking
  856. the connection, in the sense that it does not prevent hijacking the
  857. connection between the initial authentication and the
  858. @code{Kerberos-encrypt} request.
  859. @item Gssapi-encrypt \n
  860. Response expected: no.
  861. Use GSSAPI encryption to encrypt all further communication between the
  862. client and the server. This will only work if the connection was made
  863. over GSSAPI in the first place. See @code{Kerberos-encrypt}, above, for
  864. the relation between @code{Gssapi-encrypt} and @code{Gzip-stream}.
  865. Note that this request does not fully prevent an attacker from hijacking
  866. the connection, in the sense that it does not prevent hijacking the
  867. connection between the initial authentication and the
  868. @code{Gssapi-encrypt} request.
  869. @item Gssapi-authenticate \n
  870. Response expected: no.
  871. Use GSSAPI authentication to authenticate all further communication
  872. between the client and the server. This will only work if the
  873. connection was made over GSSAPI in the first place. Encrypted data is
  874. automatically authenticated, so using both @code{Gssapi-authenticate}
  875. and @code{Gssapi-encrypt} has no effect beyond that of
  876. @code{Gssapi-encrypt}. Unlike encrypted data, it is reasonable to
  877. compress authenticated data.
  878. Note that this request does not fully prevent an attacker from hijacking
  879. the connection, in the sense that it does not prevent hijacking the
  880. connection between the initial authentication and the
  881. @code{Gssapi-authenticate} request.
  882. @item Set @var{variable}=@var{value} \n
  883. Response expected: no.
  884. Set a user variable @var{variable} to @var{value}.
  885. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  886. @item expand-modules \n
  887. Response expected: yes. Expand the modules which are specified in the
  888. arguments. Returns the data in @code{Module-expansion} responses. Note
  889. that the server can assume that this is checkout or export, not rtag or
  890. rdiff; the latter do not access the working directory and thus have no
  891. need to expand modules on the client side.
  892. Expand may not be the best word for what this request does. It does not
  893. necessarily tell you all the files contained in a module, for example.
  894. Basically it is a way of telling you which working directories the
  895. server needs to know about in order to handle a checkout of the
  896. specified modules.
  897. For example, suppose that the server has a module defined by
  898. @example
  899. aliasmodule -a 1dir
  900. @end example
  901. That is, one can check out @code{aliasmodule} and it will take
  902. @code{1dir} in the repository and check it out to @code{1dir} in the
  903. working directory. Now suppose the client already has this module
  904. checked out and is planning on using the @code{co} request to update it.
  905. Without using @code{expand-modules}, the client would have two bad
  906. choices: it could either send information about @emph{all} working
  907. directories under the current directory, which could be unnecessarily
  908. slow, or it could be ignorant of the fact that @code{aliasmodule} stands
  909. for @code{1dir}, and neglect to send information for @code{1dir}, which
  910. would lead to incorrect operation.
  911. @c Those don't really seem like the only two options. I mean, what
  912. @c about keeping track of the correspondence from when we first checked
  913. @c out a fresh directory? Not that the CVS client does this, or that
  914. @c I've really thought about whether it would be a good idea...
  915. With @code{expand-modules}, the client would first ask for the module to
  916. be expanded:
  917. @example
  918. C: Root /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot
  919. . . .
  920. C: Argument aliasmodule
  921. C: Directory .
  922. C: /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot
  923. C: expand-modules
  924. S: Module-expansion 1dir
  925. S: ok
  926. @end example
  927. and then it knows to check the @file{1dir} directory and send
  928. requests such as @code{Entry} and @code{Modified} for the files in that
  929. directory.
  930. @item ci \n
  931. @itemx diff \n
  932. @itemx tag \n
  933. @itemx status \n
  934. @itemx admin \n
  935. @itemx history \n
  936. @itemx watchers \n
  937. @itemx editors \n
  938. @itemx annotate \n
  939. Response expected: yes. Actually do a cvs command. This uses any
  940. previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  941. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. The
  942. last @code{Directory} sent specifies the working directory at the time
  943. of the operation. No provision is made for any input from the user.
  944. This means that @code{ci} must use a @code{-m} argument if it wants to
  945. specify a log message.
  946. @item log \n
  947. Response expected: yes. Show information for past revisions. This uses
  948. any previous @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or @code{Modified}
  949. requests, if they have been sent. The last @code{Directory} sent
  950. specifies the working directory at the time of the operation. Also uses
  951. previous @code{Argument}'s of which the canonical forms are the
  952. following (@sc{cvs} 1.10 and older clients sent what the user specified,
  953. but clients are encouraged to use the canonical forms and other forms
  954. are deprecated):
  955. @table @code
  956. @item -b, -h, -l, -N, -R, -t
  957. These options go by themselves, one option per @code{Argument} request.
  958. @item -d @var{date1}<@var{date2}
  959. Select revisions between @var{date1} and @var{date2}. Either date
  960. may be omitted in which case there is no date limit at that end of the
  961. range (clients may specify dates such as 1 Jan 1970 or 1 Jan 2038 for
  962. similar purposes but this is problematic as it makes assumptions about
  963. what dates the server supports). Dates are in RFC822/1123 format. The
  964. @samp{-d} is one @code{Argument} request and the date range is a second
  965. one.
  966. @item -d @var{date1}<=@var{date2}
  967. Likewise but compare dates for equality.
  968. @item -d @var{singledate}
  969. Select the single, latest revision dated @var{singledate} or earlier.
  970. To include several date ranges and/or singledates, repeat the @samp{-d}
  971. option as many times as necessary.
  972. @item -r@var{rev1}:@var{rev2}
  973. @itemx -r@var{branch}
  974. @itemx -r@var{branch}.
  975. @itemx -r
  976. Specify revisions (note that @var{rev1} or @var{rev2} can be omitted, or
  977. can refer to branches). Send both the @samp{-r} and the revision
  978. information in a single @code{Argument} request. To include several
  979. revision selections, repeat the @samp{-r} option.
  980. @item -s @var{state}
  981. @itemx -w
  982. @itemx -w@var{login}
  983. Select on states or users. To include more than one state or user,
  984. repeat the option. Send the @samp{-s} option as a separate argument
  985. from the state being selected. Send the @samp{-w} option as part of the
  986. same argument as the user being selected.
  987. @end table
  988. @item co \n
  989. Response expected: yes. Get files from the repository. This uses any
  990. previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  991. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. Arguments to this
  992. command are module names; the client cannot know what directories they
  993. correspond to except by (1) just sending the @code{co} request, and then
  994. seeing what directory names the server sends back in its responses, and
  995. (2) the @code{expand-modules} request.
  996. @item export \n
  997. Response expected: yes. Get files from the repository. This uses any
  998. previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  999. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. Arguments to this
  1000. command are module names, as described for the @code{co} request. The
  1001. intention behind this command is that a client can get sources from a
  1002. server without storing CVS information about those sources. That is, a
  1003. client probably should not count on being able to take the entries line
  1004. returned in the @code{Created} response from an @code{export} request
  1005. and send it in a future @code{Entry} request. Note that the entries
  1006. line in the @code{Created} response must indicate whether the file is
  1007. binary or text, so the client can create it correctly.
  1008. @item rannotate \n
  1009. @itemx rdiff \n
  1010. @itemx rlog \n
  1011. @itemx rtag \n
  1012. Response expected: yes. Actually do a cvs command. This uses any
  1013. previous @code{Argument} requests, if they have been sent. The client
  1014. should not send @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or @code{Modified}
  1015. requests for these commands; they are not used. Arguments to these
  1016. commands are module names, as described for @code{co}.
  1017. @item update \n
  1018. Response expected: yes. Actually do a @code{cvs update} command. This
  1019. uses any previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry},
  1020. or @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. The
  1021. last @code{Directory} sent specifies the working directory at the time
  1022. of the operation. The @code{-I} option is not used--files which the
  1023. client can decide whether to ignore are not mentioned and the client
  1024. sends the @code{Questionable} request for others.
  1025. @item import \n
  1026. Response expected: yes. Actually do a @code{cvs import} command. This
  1027. uses any previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  1028. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. The
  1029. last @code{Directory} sent specifies the working directory at the time
  1030. of the operation - unlike most commands, the repository field of each
  1031. @code{Directory} request is ignored (it merely must point somewhere
  1032. within the root). The files to be imported are sent in @code{Modified}
  1033. requests (files which the client knows should be ignored are not sent;
  1034. the server must still process the CVSROOT/cvsignore file unless -I !@: is
  1035. sent). A log message must have been specified with a @code{-m}
  1036. argument.
  1037. @item add \n
  1038. Response expected: yes. Add a file or directory. This uses any
  1039. previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  1040. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. The
  1041. last @code{Directory} sent specifies the working directory at the time
  1042. of the operation.
  1043. To add a directory, send the directory to be added using
  1044. @code{Directory} and @code{Argument} requests. For example:
  1045. @example
  1046. C: Root /u/cvsroot
  1047. . . .
  1048. C: Argument nsdir
  1049. C: Directory nsdir
  1050. C: /u/cvsroot/1dir/nsdir
  1051. C: Directory .
  1052. C: /u/cvsroot/1dir
  1053. C: add
  1054. S: M Directory /u/cvsroot/1dir/nsdir added to the repository
  1055. S: ok
  1056. @end example
  1057. You will notice that the server does not signal to the client in any
  1058. particular way that the directory has been successfully added. The
  1059. client is supposed to just assume that the directory has been added and
  1060. update its records accordingly. Note also that adding a directory is
  1061. immediate; it does not wait until a @code{ci} request as files do.
  1062. To add a file, send the file to be added using a @code{Modified}
  1063. request. For example:
  1064. @example
  1065. C: Argument nfile
  1066. C: Directory .
  1067. C: /u/cvsroot/1dir
  1068. C: Modified nfile
  1069. C: u=rw,g=r,o=r
  1070. C: 6
  1071. C: hello
  1072. C: add
  1073. S: E cvs server: scheduling file `nfile' for addition
  1074. S: Mode u=rw,g=r,o=r
  1075. S: Checked-in ./
  1076. S: /u/cvsroot/1dir/nfile
  1077. S: /nfile/0///
  1078. S: E cvs server: use 'cvs commit' to add this file permanently
  1079. S: ok
  1080. @end example
  1081. Note that the file has not been added to the repository; the only effect
  1082. of a successful @code{add} request, for a file, is to supply the client
  1083. with a new entries line containing @samp{0} to indicate an added file.
  1084. In fact, the client probably could perform this operation without
  1085. contacting the server, although using @code{add} does cause the server
  1086. to perform a few more checks.
  1087. The client sends a subsequent @code{ci} to actually add the file to the
  1088. repository.
  1089. Another quirk of the @code{add} request is that with CVS 1.9 and older,
  1090. a pathname specified in
  1091. an @code{Argument} request cannot contain @samp{/}. There is no good
  1092. reason for this restriction, and in fact more recent CVS servers don't
  1093. have it.
  1094. But the way to interoperate with the older servers is to ensure that
  1095. all @code{Directory} requests for @code{add} (except those used to add
  1096. directories, as described above), use @samp{.} for
  1097. @var{local-directory}. Specifying another string for
  1098. @var{local-directory} may not get an error, but it will get you strange
  1099. @code{Checked-in} responses from the buggy servers.
  1100. @item remove \n
  1101. Response expected: yes. Remove a file. This uses any
  1102. previous @code{Argument}, @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or
  1103. @code{Modified} requests, if they have been sent. The
  1104. last @code{Directory} sent specifies the working directory at the time
  1105. of the operation.
  1106. Note that this request does not actually do anything to the repository;
  1107. the only effect of a successful @code{remove} request is to supply the
  1108. client with a new entries line containing @samp{-} to indicate a removed
  1109. file. In fact, the client probably could perform this operation without
  1110. contacting the server, although using @code{remove} may cause the server
  1111. to perform a few more checks.
  1112. The client sends a subsequent @code{ci} request to actually record the
  1113. removal in the repository.
  1114. @item watch-on \n
  1115. @itemx watch-off \n
  1116. @itemx watch-add \n
  1117. @itemx watch-remove \n
  1118. Response expected: yes. Actually do the @code{cvs watch on}, @code{cvs
  1119. watch off}, @code{cvs watch add}, and @code{cvs watch remove} commands,
  1120. respectively. This uses any previous @code{Argument},
  1121. @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, or @code{Modified}
  1122. requests, if they have been sent. The last @code{Directory} sent
  1123. specifies the working directory at the time of the operation.
  1124. @item release \n
  1125. Response expected: yes. Note that a @code{cvs release} command has
  1126. taken place and update the history file accordingly.
  1127. @item noop \n
  1128. Response expected: yes. This request is a null command in the sense
  1129. that it doesn't do anything, but merely (as with any other requests
  1130. expecting a response) sends back any responses pertaining to pending
  1131. errors, pending @code{Notified} responses, etc.
  1132. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  1133. @item update-patches \n
  1134. Response expected: yes.
  1135. This request does not actually do anything. It is used as a signal that
  1136. the server is able to generate patches when given an @code{update}
  1137. request. The client must issue the @code{-u} argument to @code{update}
  1138. in order to receive patches.
  1139. @item gzip-file-contents @var{level} \n
  1140. Response expected: no. Note that this request does not follow the
  1141. response convention stated above. @code{Gzip-stream} is suggested
  1142. instead of @code{gzip-file-contents} as it gives better compression; the
  1143. only reason to implement the latter is to provide compression with
  1144. @sc{cvs} 1.8 and earlier. The @code{gzip-file-contents} request asks
  1145. the server to compress files it sends to the client using @code{gzip}
  1146. (RFC1952/1951) compression, using the specified level of compression.
  1147. If this request is not made, the server must not compress files.
  1148. This is only a hint to the server. It may still decide (for example, in
  1149. the case of very small files, or files that already appear to be
  1150. compressed) not to do the compression. Compression is indicated by a
  1151. @samp{z} preceding the file length.
  1152. Availability of this request in the server indicates to the client that
  1153. it may compress files sent to the server, regardless of whether the
  1154. client actually uses this request.
  1155. @item wrapper-sendme-rcsOptions \n
  1156. Response expected: yes.
  1157. Request that the server transmit mappings from filenames to keyword
  1158. expansion modes in @code{Wrapper-rcsOption} responses.
  1159. @item version \n
  1160. Response expected: yes.
  1161. Request that the server transmit its version message.
  1162. The @code{Root} request need not have been previously sent.
  1163. @item @var{other-request} @var{text} \n
  1164. Response expected: yes.
  1165. Any unrecognized request expects a response, and does not
  1166. contain any additional data. The response will normally be something like
  1167. @samp{error unrecognized request}, but it could be a different error if
  1168. a previous request which doesn't expect a response produced an error.
  1169. @end table
  1170. When the client is done, it drops the connection.
  1171. @node Response intro
  1172. @section Introduction to Responses
  1173. After a command which expects a response, the server sends however many
  1174. of the following responses are appropriate. The server should not send
  1175. data at other times (the current implementation may violate this
  1176. principle in a few minor places, where the server is printing an error
  1177. message and exiting---this should be investigated further).
  1178. Any set of responses always ends with @samp{error} or @samp{ok}. This
  1179. indicates that the response is over.
  1180. @c "file updating response" and "file update modifying response" are
  1181. @c lame terms (mostly because they are so awkward). Any better ideas?
  1182. The responses @code{Checked-in}, @code{New-entry}, @code{Updated},
  1183. @code{Created}, @code{Update-existing}, @code{Merged}, and
  1184. @code{Patched} are referred to as @dfn{file updating} responses, because
  1185. they change the status of a file in the working directory in some way.
  1186. The responses @code{Mode}, @code{Mod-time}, and @code{Checksum} are
  1187. referred to as @dfn{file update modifying} responses because they modify
  1188. the next file updating response. In no case shall a file update
  1189. modifying response apply to a file updating response other than the next
  1190. one. Nor can the same file update modifying response occur twice for
  1191. a given file updating response (if servers diagnose this problem, it may
  1192. aid in detecting the case where clients send an update modifying
  1193. response without following it by a file updating response).
  1194. @node Response pathnames
  1195. @section The "pathname" in responses
  1196. Many of the responses contain something called @var{pathname}.
  1197. @c FIXME: should better document when the specified repository needs to
  1198. @c end in "/.".
  1199. The name is somewhat misleading; it actually indicates a pair of
  1200. pathnames. First, a local directory name
  1201. relative to the directory in which the command was given (i.e., the last
  1202. @code{Directory} before the command). Then a linefeed and a repository
  1203. name. Then
  1204. a slash and the filename (without a @samp{,v} ending).
  1205. For example, for a file @file{i386.mh}
  1206. which is in the local directory @file{gas.clean/config} and for which
  1207. the repository is @file{/rel/cvsfiles/devo/gas/config}:
  1208. @example
  1209. gas.clean/config/
  1210. /rel/cvsfiles/devo/gas/config/i386.mh
  1211. @end example
  1212. If the server wants to tell the client to create a directory, then it
  1213. merely uses the directory in any response, as described above, and the
  1214. client should create the directory if it does not exist. Note that this
  1215. should only be done one directory at a time, in order to permit the
  1216. client to correctly store the repository for each directory. Servers
  1217. can use requests such as @code{Clear-sticky},
  1218. @code{Clear-static-directory}, or any other requests, to create
  1219. directories.
  1220. @c FIXME: Need example here of how "repository" needs to be sent for
  1221. @c each directory, and cannot be correctly deduced from, say, the most
  1222. @c deeply nested directory.
  1223. Some server
  1224. implementations may poorly distinguish between a directory which should
  1225. not exist and a directory which contains no files; in order to refrain
  1226. from creating empty directories a client should both send the @samp{-P}
  1227. option to @code{update} or @code{co}, and should also detect the case in
  1228. which the server asks to create a directory but not any files within it
  1229. (in that case the client should remove the directory or refrain from
  1230. creating it in the first place). Note that servers could clean this up
  1231. greatly by only telling the client to create directories if the
  1232. directory in question should exist, but until servers do this, clients
  1233. will need to offer the @samp{-P} behavior described above.
  1234. @node Responses
  1235. @section Responses
  1236. Here are the responses:
  1237. @table @code
  1238. @item Valid-requests @var{request-list} \n
  1239. Indicate what requests the server will accept. @var{request-list}
  1240. is a space separated list of tokens. If the server supports sending
  1241. patches, it will include @samp{update-patches} in this list. The
  1242. @samp{update-patches} request does not actually do anything.
  1243. @item Checked-in @var{pathname} \n
  1244. Additional data: New Entries line, \n. This means a file @var{pathname}
  1245. has been successfully operated on (checked in, added, etc.). The name in
  1246. the Entries line is the same as the last component of @var{pathname}.
  1247. @item New-entry @var{pathname} \n
  1248. Additional data: New Entries line, \n. Like @code{Checked-in}, but the
  1249. file is not up to date.
  1250. @item Updated @var{pathname} \n
  1251. Additional data: New Entries line, \n, mode, \n, file transmission. A
  1252. new copy of the file is enclosed. This is used for a new revision of an
  1253. existing file, or for a new file, or for any other case in which the
  1254. local (client-side) copy of the file needs to be updated, and after
  1255. being updated it will be up to date. If any directory in pathname does
  1256. not exist, create it. This response is not used if @code{Created} and
  1257. @code{Update-existing} are supported.
  1258. @item Created @var{pathname} \n
  1259. This is just like @code{Updated} and takes the same additional data, but
  1260. is used only if no @code{Entry}, @code{Modified}, or
  1261. @code{Unchanged} request has been sent for the file in question. The
  1262. distinction between @code{Created} and @code{Update-existing} is so
  1263. that the client can give an error message in several cases: (1) there is
  1264. a file in the working directory, but not one for which @code{Entry},
  1265. @code{Modified}, or @code{Unchanged} was sent (for example, a file which
  1266. was ignored, or a file for which @code{Questionable} was sent), (2)
  1267. there is a file in the working directory whose name differs from the one
  1268. mentioned in @code{Created} in ways that the client is unable to use to
  1269. distinguish files. For example, the client is case-insensitive and the
  1270. names differ only in case.
  1271. @item Update-existing @var{pathname} \n
  1272. This is just like @code{Updated} and takes the same additional data, but
  1273. is used only if a @code{Entry}, @code{Modified}, or @code{Unchanged}
  1274. request has been sent for the file in question.
  1275. This response, or @code{Merged}, indicates that the server has
  1276. determined that it is OK to overwrite the previous contents of the file
  1277. specified by @var{pathname}. Provided that the client has correctly
  1278. sent @code{Modified} or @code{Is-modified} requests for a modified file,
  1279. and the file was not modified while CVS was running, the server can
  1280. ensure that a user's modifications are not lost.
  1281. @item Merged @var{pathname} \n
  1282. This is just like @code{Updated} and takes the same additional data,
  1283. with the one difference that after the new copy of the file is enclosed,
  1284. it will still not be up to date. Used for the results of a merge, with
  1285. or without conflicts.
  1286. It is useful to preserve an copy of what the file looked like before the
  1287. merge. This is basically handled by the server; before sending
  1288. @code{Merged} it will send a @code{Copy-file} response. For example, if
  1289. the file is @file{aa} and it derives from revision 1.3, the
  1290. @code{Copy-file} response will tell the client to copy @file{aa} to
  1291. @file{.#aa.1.3}. It is up to the client to decide how long to keep this
  1292. file around; traditionally clients have left it around forever, thus
  1293. letting the user clean it up as desired. But another answer, such as
  1294. until the next commit, might be preferable.
  1295. @item Rcs-diff @var{pathname} \n
  1296. This is just like @code{Updated} and takes the same additional data,
  1297. with the one difference that instead of sending a new copy of the file,
  1298. the server sends an RCS change text. This change text is produced by
  1299. @samp{diff -n} (the GNU diff @samp{-a} option may also be used). The
  1300. client must apply this change text to the existing file. This will only
  1301. be used when the client has an exact copy of an earlier revision of a
  1302. file. This response is only used if the @code{update} command is given
  1303. the @samp{-u} argument.
  1304. @item Patched @var{pathname} \n
  1305. This is just like @code{Rcs-diff} and takes the same additional data,
  1306. except that it sends a standard patch rather than an RCS change text.
  1307. The patch is produced by @samp{diff -c} for @sc{cvs} 1.6 and later (see
  1308. POSIX.2 for a description of this format), or @samp{diff -u} for
  1309. previous versions of @sc{cvs}; clients are encouraged to accept either
  1310. format. Like @code{Rcs-diff}, this response is only used if the
  1311. @code{update} command is given the @samp{-u} argument.
  1312. The @code{Patched} response is deprecated in favor of the
  1313. @code{Rcs-diff} response. However, older clients (CVS 1.9 and earlier)
  1314. only support @code{Patched}.
  1315. @item Mode @var{mode} \n
  1316. This @var{mode} applies to the next file mentioned in
  1317. @code{Checked-in}. @code{Mode} is a file update modifying response
  1318. as described in @ref{Response intro}.
  1319. @item Mod-time @var{time} \n
  1320. Set the modification time of the next file sent to @var{time}.
  1321. @code{Mod-time} is a file update modifying response
  1322. as described in @ref{Response intro}.
  1323. The
  1324. @var{time} is in the format specified by RFC822 as modified by RFC1123.
  1325. The server may specify any timezone it chooses; clients will want to
  1326. convert that to their own timezone as appropriate. An example of this
  1327. format is:
  1328. @example
  1329. 26 May 1997 13:01:40 -0400
  1330. @end example
  1331. There is no requirement that the client and server clocks be
  1332. synchronized. The server just sends its recommendation for a timestamp
  1333. (based on its own clock, presumably), and the client should just believe
  1334. it (this means that the time might be in the future, for example).
  1335. If the server does not send @code{Mod-time} for a given file, the client
  1336. should pick a modification time in the usual way (usually, just let the
  1337. operating system set the modification time to the time that the CVS
  1338. command is running).
  1339. @item Checksum @var{checksum}\n
  1340. The @var{checksum} applies to the next file sent (that is,
  1341. @code{Checksum} is a file update modifying response
  1342. as described in @ref{Response intro}).
  1343. In the case of
  1344. @code{Patched}, the checksum applies to the file after being patched,
  1345. not to the patch itself. The client should compute the checksum itself,
  1346. after receiving the file or patch, and signal an error if the checksums
  1347. do not match. The checksum is the 128 bit MD5 checksum represented as
  1348. 32 hex digits (MD5 is described in RFC1321).
  1349. This response is optional, and is only used if the
  1350. client supports it (as judged by the @code{Valid-responses} request).
  1351. @item Copy-file @var{pathname} \n
  1352. Additional data: @var{newname} \n. Copy file @var{pathname} to
  1353. @var{newname} in the same directory where it already is. This does not
  1354. affect @code{CVS/Entries}.
  1355. This can optionally be implemented as a rename instead of a copy. The
  1356. only use for it which currently has been identified is prior to a
  1357. @code{Merged} response as described under @code{Merged}. Clients can
  1358. probably assume that is how it is being used, if they want to worry
  1359. about things like how long to keep the @var{newname} file around.
  1360. @item Removed @var{pathname} \n
  1361. The file has been removed from the repository (this is the case where
  1362. cvs prints @samp{file foobar.c is no longer pertinent}).
  1363. @item Remove-entry @var{pathname} \n
  1364. The file needs its entry removed from @code{CVS/Entries}, but the file
  1365. itself is already gone (this happens in response to a @code{ci} request
  1366. which involves committing the removal of a file).
  1367. @item Set-static-directory @var{pathname} \n
  1368. This instructs the client to set the @code{Entries.Static} flag, which
  1369. it should then send back to the server in a @code{Static-directory}
  1370. request whenever the directory is operated on. @var{pathname} ends in a
  1371. slash; its purpose is to specify a directory, not a file within a
  1372. directory.
  1373. @item Clear-static-directory @var{pathname} \n
  1374. Like @code{Set-static-directory}, but clear, not set, the flag.
  1375. @item Set-sticky @var{pathname} \n
  1376. Additional data: @var{tagspec} \n. Tell the client to set a sticky tag
  1377. or date, which should be supplied with the @code{Sticky} request for
  1378. future operations. @var{pathname} ends in a slash; its purpose is to
  1379. specify a directory, not a file within a directory. The client should
  1380. store @var{tagspec} and pass it back to the server as-is, to allow for
  1381. future expansion. The first character of @var{tagspec} is @samp{T} for
  1382. a tag, @samp{D} for a date, or something else for future expansion. The
  1383. remainder of @var{tagspec} contains the actual tag or date.
  1384. @item Clear-sticky @var{pathname} \n
  1385. Clear any sticky tag or date set by @code{Set-sticky}.
  1386. @item Template @var{pathname} \n
  1387. Additional data: file transmission (note: compressed file transmissions
  1388. are not supported). @var{pathname} ends in a slash; its purpose is to
  1389. specify a directory, not a file within a directory. Tell the client to
  1390. store the file transmission as the template log message, and then use
  1391. that template in the future when prompting the user for a log message.
  1392. @item Notified @var{pathname} \n
  1393. Indicate to the client that the notification for @var{pathname} has been
  1394. done. There should be one such response for every @code{Notify}
  1395. request; if there are several @code{Notify} requests for a single file,
  1396. the requests should be processed in order; the first @code{Notified}
  1397. response pertains to the first @code{Notify} request, etc.
  1398. @item Module-expansion @var{pathname} \n
  1399. Return a file or directory
  1400. which is included in a particular module. @var{pathname} is relative
  1401. to cvsroot, unlike most pathnames in responses. @var{pathname} should
  1402. be used to look and see whether some or all of the module exists on
  1403. the client side; it is not necessarily suitable for passing as an
  1404. argument to a @code{co} request (for example, if the modules file
  1405. contains the @samp{-d} option, it will be the directory specified with
  1406. @samp{-d}, not the name of the module).
  1407. @item Wrapper-rcsOption @var{pattern} -k '@var{option}' \n
  1408. Transmit to the client a filename pattern which implies a certain
  1409. keyword expansion mode. The @var{pattern} is a wildcard pattern (for
  1410. example, @samp{*.exe}. The @var{option} is @samp{b} for binary, and so
  1411. on. Note that although the syntax happens to resemble the syntax in
  1412. certain CVS configuration files, it is more constrained; there must be
  1413. exactly one space between @var{pattern} and @samp{-k} and exactly one
  1414. space between @samp{-k} and @samp{'}, and no string is permitted in
  1415. place of @samp{-k} (extensions should be done with new responses, not by
  1416. extending this one, for graceful handling of @code{Valid-responses}).
  1417. @item M @var{text} \n
  1418. A one-line message for the user.
  1419. Note that the format of @var{text} is not designed for machine parsing.
  1420. Although sometimes scripts and clients will have little choice, the
  1421. exact text which is output is subject to vary at the discretion of the
  1422. server and the example output given in this document is just that,
  1423. example output. Servers are encouraged to use the @samp{MT} response,
  1424. and future versions of this document will hopefully standardize more of
  1425. the @samp{MT} tags; see @ref{Text tags}.
  1426. @item Mbinary \n
  1427. Additional data: file transmission (note: compressed file transmissions
  1428. are not supported). This is like @samp{M}, except the contents of the
  1429. file transmission are binary and should be copied to standard output
  1430. without translation to local text file conventions. To transmit a text
  1431. file to standard output, servers should use a series of @samp{M} requests.
  1432. @item E @var{text} \n
  1433. Same as @code{M} but send to stderr not stdout.
  1434. @item F \n
  1435. @c FIXME: The second sentence, defining "flush", is somewhat off the top
  1436. @c of my head. Is there some text we can steal from ANSI C or someplace
  1437. @c which is more carefully thought out?
  1438. Flush stderr. That is, make it possible for the user to see what has
  1439. been written to stderr (it is up to the implementation to decide exactly
  1440. how far it should go to ensure this).
  1441. @item MT @var{tagname} @var{data} \n
  1442. This response provides for tagged text. It is similar to
  1443. SGML/HTML/XML in that the data is structured and a naive application
  1444. can also make some sense of it without understanding the structure.
  1445. The syntax is not SGML-like, however, in order to fit into the CVS
  1446. protocol better and (more importantly) to make it easier to parse,
  1447. especially in a language like perl or awk.
  1448. The @var{tagname} can have several forms. If it starts with @samp{a}
  1449. to @samp{z} or @samp{A} to @samp{Z}, then it represents tagged text.
  1450. If the implementation recognizes @var{tagname}, then it may interpret
  1451. @var{data} in some particular fashion. If the implementation does not
  1452. recognize @var{tagname}, then it should simply treat @var{data} as
  1453. text to be sent to the user (similar to an @samp{M} response). There
  1454. are two tags which are general purpose. The @samp{text} tag is
  1455. similar to an unrecognized tag in that it provides text which will
  1456. ordinarily be sent to the user. The @samp{newline} tag is used
  1457. without @var{data} and indicates that a newline will ordinarily be
  1458. sent to the user (there is no provision for embedding newlines in the
  1459. @var{data} of other tagged text responses).
  1460. If @var{tagname} starts with @samp{+} it indicates a start tag and if
  1461. it starts with @samp{-} it indicates an end tag. The remainder of
  1462. @var{tagname} should be the same for matching start and end tags, and
  1463. tags should be nested (for example one could have tags in the
  1464. following order @code{+bold} @code{+italic} @code{text} @code{-italic}
  1465. @code{-bold} but not @code{+bold} @code{+italic} @code{text}
  1466. @code{-bold} @code{-italic}). A particular start and end tag may be
  1467. documented to constrain the tagged text responses which are valid
  1468. between them.
  1469. Note that if @var{data} is present there will always be exactly one
  1470. space between @var{tagname} and @var{data}; if there is more than one
  1471. space, then the spaces beyond the first are part of @var{data}.
  1472. Here is an example of some tagged text responses. Note that there is
  1473. a trailing space after @samp{Checking in} and @samp{initial revision:}
  1474. and there are two trailing spaces after @samp{<--}. Such trailing
  1475. spaces are, of course, part of @var{data}.
  1476. @example
  1477. MT +checking-in
  1478. MT text Checking in
  1479. MT fname gz.tst
  1480. MT text ;
  1481. MT newline
  1482. MT rcsfile /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot/foo/gz.tst,v
  1483. MT text <--
  1484. MT fname gz.tst
  1485. MT newline
  1486. MT text initial revision:
  1487. MT init-rev 1.1
  1488. MT newline
  1489. MT text done
  1490. MT newline
  1491. MT -checking-in
  1492. @end example
  1493. If the client does not support the @samp{MT} response, the same
  1494. responses might be sent as:
  1495. @example
  1496. M Checking in gz.tst;
  1497. M /home/kingdon/zwork/cvsroot/foo/gz.tst,v <-- gz.tst
  1498. M initial revision: 1.1
  1499. M done
  1500. @end example
  1501. For a list of specific tags, see @ref{Text tags}.
  1502. @item error @var{errno-code} @samp{ } @var{text} \n
  1503. The command completed with an error. @var{errno-code} is a symbolic
  1504. error code (e.g. @code{ENOENT}); if the server doesn't support this
  1505. feature, or if it's not appropriate for this particular message, it just
  1506. omits the errno-code (in that case there are two spaces after
  1507. @samp{error}). Text is an error message such as that provided by
  1508. strerror(), or any other message the server wants to use.
  1509. The @var{text} is like the @code{M} response, in the sense that it is
  1510. not particularly intended to be machine-parsed; servers may wish to
  1511. print an error message with @code{MT} responses, and then issue a
  1512. @code{error} response without @var{text} (although it should be noted
  1513. that @code{MT} currently has no way of flagging the output as intended
  1514. for standard error, the way that the @code{E} response does).
  1515. @item ok \n
  1516. The command completed successfully.
  1517. @end table
  1518. @node Text tags
  1519. @section Tags for the MT tagged text response
  1520. The @code{MT} response, as described in @ref{Responses}, offers a
  1521. way for the server to send tagged text to the client. This section
  1522. describes specific tags. The intention is to update this section as
  1523. servers add new tags.
  1524. In the following descriptions, @code{text} and @code{newline} tags are
  1525. omitted. Such tags contain information which is intended for users (or
  1526. to be discarded), and are subject to change at the whim of the server.
  1527. To avoid being vulnerable to such whim, clients should look for the tags
  1528. listed here, not @code{text}, @code{newline}, or other tags.
  1529. The following tag means to indicate to the user that a file has been
  1530. updated. It is more or less redundant with the @code{Created} and
  1531. @code{Update-existing} responses, but we don't try to specify here
  1532. whether it occurs in exactly the same circumstances as @code{Created}
  1533. and @code{Update-existing}. The @var{name} is the pathname of the file
  1534. being updated relative to the directory in which the command is
  1535. occurring (that is, the last @code{Directory} request which is sent
  1536. before the command).
  1537. @example
  1538. MT +updated
  1539. MT fname @var{name}
  1540. MT -updated
  1541. @end example
  1542. The @code{importmergecmd} tag is used when doing an import which has
  1543. conflicts. The client can use it to report how to merge in the newly
  1544. imported changes. The @var{count} is the number of conflicts. The
  1545. newly imported changes can be merged by running the following command:
  1546. @smallexample
  1547. cvs checkout -j @var{tag1} -j @var{tag2} @var{repository}
  1548. @end smallexample
  1549. @example
  1550. MT +importmergecmd
  1551. MT conflicts @var{count}
  1552. MT mergetag1 @var{tag1}
  1553. MT mergetag2 @var{tag2}
  1554. MT repository @var{repository}
  1555. MT -importmergecmd
  1556. @end example
  1557. @node Example
  1558. @section Example
  1559. @c The C:/S: convention is in imitation of RFC1869 (and presumably
  1560. @c other RFC's). In other formatting concerns, we might want to think
  1561. @c about whether there is an easy way to provide RFC1543 formatting
  1562. @c (without negating the advantages of texinfo), and whether we should
  1563. @c use RFC2234 BNF (I fear that would be less clear than
  1564. @c what we do now, however). Plus what about RFC2119 terminology (MUST,
  1565. @c SHOULD, &c) or ISO terminology (shall, should, or whatever they are)?
  1566. Here is an example; lines are prefixed by @samp{C: } to indicate the
  1567. client sends them or @samp{S: } to indicate the server sends them.
  1568. The client starts by connecting, sending the root, and completing the
  1569. protocol negotiation. In actual practice the lists of valid responses
  1570. and requests would be longer.
  1571. @c The reason that we artificially shorten the lists is to avoid phony
  1572. @c line breaks. Any better solutions?
  1573. @c Other than that, this exchange is taken verbatim from the data
  1574. @c exchanged by CVS (as of Nov 1996). That is why some of the requests and
  1575. @c responses are not quite what you would pick for pedagogical purposes.
  1576. @example
  1577. C: Root /u/cvsroot
  1578. C: Valid-responses ok error Checked-in M E
  1579. C: valid-requests
  1580. S: Valid-requests Root Directory Entry Modified Argument Argumentx ci co
  1581. S: ok
  1582. C: UseUnchanged
  1583. @end example
  1584. The client wants to check out the @code{supermunger} module into a fresh
  1585. working directory. Therefore it first expands the @code{supermunger}
  1586. module; this step would be omitted if the client was operating on a
  1587. directory rather than a module.
  1588. @c Why does it send Directory here? The description of expand-modules
  1589. @c doesn't really say much of anything about what use, if any, it makes of
  1590. @c Directory and similar requests sent previously.
  1591. @example
  1592. C: Argument supermunger
  1593. C: Directory .
  1594. C: /u/cvsroot
  1595. C: expand-modules
  1596. @end example
  1597. The server replies that the @code{supermunger} module expands to the
  1598. directory @code{supermunger} (the simplest case):
  1599. @example
  1600. S: Module-expansion supermunger
  1601. S: ok
  1602. @end example
  1603. The client then proceeds to check out the directory. The fact that it
  1604. sends only a single @code{Directory} request which specifies @samp{.}
  1605. for the working directory means that there is not already a
  1606. @code{supermunger} directory on the client.
  1607. @c What is -N doing here?
  1608. @example
  1609. C: Argument -N
  1610. C: Argument supermunger
  1611. C: Directory .
  1612. C: /u/cvsroot
  1613. C: co
  1614. @end example
  1615. The server replies with the requested files. In this example, there is
  1616. only one file, @file{mungeall.c}. The @code{Clear-sticky} and
  1617. @code{Clear-static-directory} requests are sent by the current
  1618. implementation but they have no effect because the default is for those
  1619. settings to be clear when a directory is newly created.
  1620. @example
  1621. S: Clear-sticky supermunger/
  1622. S: /u/cvsroot/supermunger/
  1623. S: Clear-static-directory supermunger/
  1624. S: /u/cvsroot/supermunger/
  1625. S: E cvs server: Updating supermunger
  1626. S: M U supermunger/mungeall.c
  1627. S: Created supermunger/
  1628. S: /u/cvsroot/supermunger/mungeall.c
  1629. S: /mungeall.c/1.1///
  1630. S: u=rw,g=r,o=r
  1631. S: 26
  1632. S: int mein () @{ abort (); @}
  1633. S: ok
  1634. @end example
  1635. The current client implementation would break the connection here and make a
  1636. new connection for the next command. However, the protocol allows it
  1637. to keep the connection open and continue, which is what we show here.
  1638. After the user modifies the file and instructs the client to check it
  1639. back in. The client sends arguments to specify the log message and file
  1640. to check in:
  1641. @example
  1642. C: Argument -m
  1643. C: Argument Well, you see, it took me hours and hours to find
  1644. C: Argumentx this typo and I searched and searched and eventually
  1645. C: Argumentx had to ask John for help.
  1646. C: Argument mungeall.c
  1647. @end example
  1648. It also sends information about the contents of the working directory,
  1649. including the new contents of the modified file. Note that the user has
  1650. changed into the @file{supermunger} directory before executing this
  1651. command; the top level directory is a user-visible concept because the
  1652. server should print filenames in @code{M} and @code{E} responses
  1653. relative to that directory.
  1654. @c We are waving our hands about the order of the requests. "Directory"
  1655. @c and "Argument" can be in any order, but this probably isn't specified
  1656. @c very well.
  1657. @example
  1658. C: Directory .
  1659. C: /u/cvsroot/supermunger
  1660. C: Entry /mungeall.c/1.1///
  1661. C: Modified mungeall.c
  1662. C: u=rw,g=r,o=r
  1663. C: 26
  1664. C: int main () @{ abort (); @}
  1665. @end example
  1666. And finally, the client issues the checkin command (which makes use of
  1667. the data just sent):
  1668. @example
  1669. C: ci
  1670. @end example
  1671. And the server tells the client that the checkin succeeded:
  1672. @example
  1673. S: M Checking in mungeall.c;
  1674. S: E /u/cvsroot/supermunger/mungeall.c,v <-- mungeall.c
  1675. S: E new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
  1676. S: E done
  1677. S: Mode u=rw,g=r,o=r
  1678. S: Checked-in ./
  1679. S: /u/cvsroot/supermunger/mungeall.c
  1680. S: /mungeall.c/1.2///
  1681. S: ok
  1682. @end example
  1683. @node Requirements
  1684. @section Required versus optional parts of the protocol
  1685. The following are part of every known implementation of the CVS protocol
  1686. (except obsolete, pre-1.5, versions of CVS) and it is considered
  1687. reasonable behavior to completely fail to work if you are connected with
  1688. an implementation which attempts to not support them. Requests:
  1689. @code{Root}, @code{Valid-responses}, @code{valid-requests},
  1690. @code{Directory}, @code{Entry}, @code{Modified}, @code{Unchanged},
  1691. @code{Argument}, @code{Argumentx}, @code{ci}, @code{co}, @code{update}.
  1692. Responses: @code{ok}, @code{error}, @code{Valid-requests},
  1693. @code{Checked-in}, @code{Updated}, @code{Merged}, @code{Removed},
  1694. @code{M}, @code{E}.
  1695. A server need not implement @code{Repository}, but in order to interoperate
  1696. with CVS 1.5 through 1.9 it must claim to implement it (in
  1697. @code{Valid-requests}). The client will not actually send the request.
  1698. @node Obsolete
  1699. @section Obsolete protocol elements
  1700. This section briefly describes protocol elements which are obsolete.
  1701. There is no attempt to document them in full detail.
  1702. There was a @code{Repository} request which was like @code{Directory}
  1703. except it only provided @var{repository}, and the local directory was
  1704. assumed to be similarly named.
  1705. If the @code{UseUnchanged} request was not sent, there was a @code{Lost}
  1706. request which was sent to indicate that a file did not exist in the
  1707. working directory, and the meaning of sending @code{Entries} without
  1708. @code{Lost} or @code{Modified} was different. All current clients (CVS
  1709. 1.5 and later) will send @code{UseUnchanged} if it is supported.
  1710. @node Protocol Notes
  1711. @chapter Notes on the Protocol
  1712. A number of enhancements are possible. Also see the file @sc{todo} in
  1713. the @sc{cvs} source distribution, which has further ideas concerning
  1714. various aspects of @sc{cvs}, some of which impact the protocol.
  1715. Similarly, the @code{http://cvs.nongnu.org} site, in particular the
  1716. @cite{Development} pages.
  1717. @itemize @bullet
  1718. @item
  1719. The @code{Modified} request could be sped up by sending diffs rather
  1720. than entire files. The client would need some way to keep the version
  1721. of the file which was originally checked out; probably requiring the use
  1722. of "cvs edit" in this case is the most sensible course (the "cvs edit"
  1723. could be handled by a package like VC for emacs). This would also allow
  1724. local operation of @code{cvs diff} without arguments.
  1725. @item
  1726. The fact that @code{pserver} requires an extra network turnaround in
  1727. order to perform authentication would be nice to avoid. This relates to
  1728. the issue of reporting errors; probably the clean solution is to defer
  1729. the error until the client has issued a request which expects a
  1730. response. To some extent this might relate to the next item (in terms
  1731. of how easy it is to skip a whole bunch of requests until we get to one
  1732. that expects a response). I know that the kerberos code doesn't wait in
  1733. this fashion, but that probably can cause network deadlocks and perhaps
  1734. future problems running over a transport which is more transaction
  1735. oriented than TCP. On the other hand I'm not sure it is wise to make
  1736. the client conduct a lengthy upload only to find there is an
  1737. authentication failure.
  1738. @item
  1739. The protocol uses an extra network turnaround for protocol negotiation
  1740. (@code{valid-requests}). It might be nice to avoid this by having the
  1741. client be able to send requests and tell the server to ignore them if
  1742. they are unrecognized (different requests could produce a fatal error if
  1743. unrecognized). To do this there should be a standard syntax for
  1744. requests. For example, perhaps all future requests should be a single
  1745. line, with mechanisms analogous to @code{Argumentx}, or several requests
  1746. working together, to provide greater amounts of information. Or there
  1747. might be a standard mechanism for counted data (analogous to that used
  1748. by @code{Modified}) or continuation lines (like a generalized
  1749. @code{Argumentx}). It would be useful to compare what HTTP is planning
  1750. in this area; last I looked they were contemplating something called
  1751. Protocol Extension Protocol but I haven't looked at the relevant IETF
  1752. documents in any detail. Obviously, we want something as simple as
  1753. possible (but no simpler).
  1754. @item
  1755. The scrambling algorithm in the CVS client and server actually support
  1756. more characters than those documented in @ref{Password scrambling}.
  1757. Someday we are going to either have to document them all (but this is
  1758. not as easy as it may look, see below), or (gradually and with adequate
  1759. process) phase out the support for other characters in the CVS
  1760. implementation. This business of having the feature partly undocumented
  1761. isn't a desirable state long-term.
  1762. The problem with documenting other characters is that unless we know
  1763. what character set is in use, there is no way to make a password
  1764. portable from one system to another. For example, a with a circle on
  1765. top might have different encodings in different character sets.
  1766. It @emph{almost} works to say that the client picks an arbitrary,
  1767. unknown character set (indeed, having the CVS client know what character
  1768. set the user has in mind is a hard problem otherwise), and scrambles
  1769. according to a certain octet<->octet mapping. There are two problems
  1770. with this. One is that the protocol has no way to transmit character 10
  1771. decimal (linefeed), and the current server and clients have no way to
  1772. handle 0 decimal (NUL). This may cause problems with certain multibyte
  1773. character sets, in which octets 10 and 0 will appear in the middle of
  1774. other characters. The other problem, which is more minor and possibly
  1775. not worth worrying about, is that someone can type a password on one
  1776. system and then go to another system which uses a different encoding for
  1777. the same characters, and have their password not work.
  1778. The restriction to the ISO646 invariant subset is the best approach for
  1779. strings which are not particularly significant to users. Passwords are
  1780. visible enough that this is somewhat doubtful as applied here. ISO646
  1781. does, however, have the virtue (!?) of offending everyone. It is easy
  1782. to say "But the $ is right on people's keyboards! Surely we can't
  1783. forbid that". From a human factors point of view, that makes quite a
  1784. bit of sense. The contrary argument, of course, is that a with a circle
  1785. on top, or some of the characters poorly handled by Unicode, are on
  1786. @emph{someone}'s keyboard.
  1787. @end itemize
  1788. @bye